Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 307563228886597634
IF THERE IS ANOTHER WAY TO HANDLE IT
AGREED
LOGICAL CONSISTENCY
When western art became more jewish, post emancipation as the intelligentsia became jewish near the start of the 20th century and beyond
there is that big jump away from classicism, drawin gud etc.
not sure I'm down with every assertion
but the basic concept of jews in art -> less visual more "conceptual" art
is reasonably compelling
my own theory is visuospatial intelligence is an important factor in music composition
I'm sure you've had some similar ideas re: music as shape in musical space
I THINK SO
ALTHOUGH SOMETIMES IT SEEMS MORE LOGICAL/MATHEMATICAL
AND THERE IS A STRONG EMOTIONAL/REALIST COMPONENT
I DO NOT RECALL ANY STUNNING JEWISH VISUAL ART
INTERESTING
IT SEEMS TO ME THAT MODERN ART IS DEMOCRATIZED ART
it's ultimately a complex phenomenon, but just in terms of the basic substrate of "good melody"
AND THEREFORE IS INHERENTLY ANTI-TECHNICAL
SORT OF LIKE PUNK ROCK
you would think it makes art "accessible"
GOOD MELODY REQUIRES UNDERSTANDING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NOTES PLUS THE ABILITY TO LISTEN
but ultimately it stays quite elite
IT IS DEMOCRATIZED IN AUDIENCE
no I really disagree
BUT THERE WILL ALWAYS BE ARTISTIC ELITES
MEANING
modern art is for modern elites
not for ordinary people
THERE IS NOTHING THERE WHICH HOLDS BACK A PERSON FROM APPRECIATING OR PARTICIPATING
ordinary people do not appreciate it
THE HIGH VALUE OF ART GUARANTEES THESE ELITES
ORDINARY PEOPLE DO NOT APPRECIATE IT, BUT IT IS ACCESSIBLE TO THEM
HOWEVER IT IS NOT RELEVANT
THUS THEY DO NOT ATTEND IT
THIS SEEMS PARADOXICAL BUT IS NOT
I don't think it's accessible to them either (or to anyone)
it's part of the appeal to elites
that normal people "dont get" modern art
whereas a work of beauty is instantly accessible due to the force of its beauty