Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 308346809539887104
I wanted to try something that could have used both
I wanted to try different harmonies, and maybe even a new musical system. But then I learned about natural overtones, and realized that the current system is very good, and exists for a reason
You could do music by algoritms
With sine waves, a different system could work
But sine waves are silly
I started doing that recently, but only very simple algorithms that I don't need computer assistance for
I see
If you do not want to conserve the land, you are not a good conservative
Most neocons aren't, for this reason among others
funny how no politician or president ever talks about preserving land
ever
yet....thats the fucking thing we live on.
I almost fell for the trap of voting for The Green Party in Sweden, due to their name
yea mate its good on the surface but ultimately it doesnt solve deep-rooted political issues
Human races are part of the land, by the way
Just like other species and their races are
neocons are just liberalism + militarism
neoliberalism I guess it could be called
we'll bring you liberal democracy one way or another
with neocons conservatism finally transforms itself fully into the rear guard of leftism
They really are liberals + war - gays
liberalism results in change in ideals, conservatism ends up defending it
minus gays is no guarantee
many neocons are down with gays
Yeah, just not as many
a lot of the big heads are trotskyist jews
and those people are not ill disposed towards homosexuality
Irving Kristol is one of the seminal neocons
Hmm
“I was dead-set against gay marriage when it was first broached,” Murray said; as a fan of Edmund Burke, he regarded marriage as an ancient and indispensable cultural institution that “we shouldn’t mess with.” He used to agree with his friend Irving Kristol, the late father of neo-conservatism, that gay people wouldn’t like marriage. “ ‘Let them have it,’ ” he recounted Kristol as saying, with a chuckle. “ ‘They wont like it.’ ”
It must have been years ago that the elder Kristol said that, before support for gay marriage was a majority opinion, and yet he said it wasn’t an issue worth going to the mat for. One could take that as an illustration of neoconservative contempt for traditionalists, or as, to borrow his son’s words, “totally conformist” foresight.
I suppose they can be more for lower corporate taxes
liberals want to tax the corporations
it is right-liberalism rather than the left-liberalism of Sanders etc.
something more like Hillary Clinton
The loser often approaches the winner
that is why conservatives have become more okay with gays
conservatives have been replaced by "conservative" careerists