The carbon content of the steel matters as well

Does this look like a building that collapsed from softened steel? All 4 corners collapsing at the same time?

But I'm getting there

The World Trade Center towers used A36 steel, with a 0.26% carbon content.

Please answer my question. Does that look like a building collapse from weakened steel? From a not so major office fire?

Gwench, please stop trying to sidetrack me.

Let me finish.

No. Actually. This is very important.

The towers also used ASTM A242 steel, with a 0.12% carbon content

It's a tangent that I'm not going down right now.

It’s a tangent I wish to go down. Doesn’t that look the same as the collapse of the twin towers?

Actually, it does not

Wdym?

The twin towers collapsed due to pancaking, top down

This one collapsed from the bottom, indicating a controlled demolition.

Gotcha

Lol

That image is the collapse of tower 7

Same day

Other than that, the twin towers were also far more slender, lending to a difference in basic building structure, which I'll get to later.

Yes, I know.

Tower 7 was also not on fire.

At least, not to the extent of the larger towers.

So that is the smoking gun isn’t it?

No

Because you're sidetracking me

It was an inside job.

And not letting me finish

I didn't even get to the chemistry/physics stuff yet ;-;

I was gonna pull out the iron-carbon phase diagram

But you've shown that you won't be convinced.

So it's pointless.

No. It’s everything. The narrative is building 7 collapsed due to fire caused by debris from the twin towers.

Debris is important there Gwench

Debris causes damage

That was not a collapse from a fire. It was a controlled demolition.

Damage at the lower floors of a building creates collapses similar to explosives placed at the lower floors of a building.

Because the damage is in the same place.

You called it a controlled demolition. And you’re right. Most experts agree

I said it indicates a controlled demolition

Because of the collapse pattern