Message from @gohan
Discord ID: 547923020455477249
Actually, it does not
Wdym?
The twin towers collapsed due to pancaking, top down
This one collapsed from the bottom, indicating a controlled demolition.
Gotcha
Lol
That image is the collapse of tower 7
Same day
Other than that, the twin towers were also far more slender, lending to a difference in basic building structure, which I'll get to later.
Yes, I know.
Tower 7 was also not on fire.
At least, not to the extent of the larger towers.
So that is the smoking gun isn’t it?
No
Because you're sidetracking me
It was an inside job.
And not letting me finish
I didn't even get to the chemistry/physics stuff yet ;-;
I was gonna pull out the iron-carbon phase diagram
But you've shown that you won't be convinced.
No. It’s everything. The narrative is building 7 collapsed due to fire caused by debris from the twin towers.
Debris is important there Gwench
Debris causes damage
That was not a collapse from a fire. It was a controlled demolition.
Damage at the lower floors of a building creates collapses similar to explosives placed at the lower floors of a building.
Because the damage is in the same place.
You called it a controlled demolition. And you’re right. Most experts agree
I said it indicates a controlled demolition
Because of the collapse pattern
Since the base of the tower is not shown in that video, we cannot know.
It takes weeks to lay the charges for s controlled demolition. It’s not just done in a few hours.
It was preplanned
You're not listening, but whatever.
Since you're going to keep cutting across me, I'm just going to go.
Continue then
Look up the iron-carbon phase diagram if you're interested.
No. I asked for the temps
I’m asking you to support your claims.
And you then proceeded to distract me, and use that distraction to push a message
You can't ask for someone to support their claims, then force them on a sidetrack