It's a tangent that I'm not going down right now.

It’s a tangent I wish to go down. Doesn’t that look the same as the collapse of the twin towers?

Actually, it does not

Wdym?

The twin towers collapsed due to pancaking, top down

This one collapsed from the bottom, indicating a controlled demolition.

Gotcha

Lol

That image is the collapse of tower 7

Same day

Other than that, the twin towers were also far more slender, lending to a difference in basic building structure, which I'll get to later.

Yes, I know.

Tower 7 was also not on fire.

At least, not to the extent of the larger towers.

So that is the smoking gun isn’t it?

No

Because you're sidetracking me

It was an inside job.

And not letting me finish

I didn't even get to the chemistry/physics stuff yet ;-;

I was gonna pull out the iron-carbon phase diagram

But you've shown that you won't be convinced.

So it's pointless.

No. It’s everything. The narrative is building 7 collapsed due to fire caused by debris from the twin towers.

Debris is important there Gwench

Debris causes damage

That was not a collapse from a fire. It was a controlled demolition.

Damage at the lower floors of a building creates collapses similar to explosives placed at the lower floors of a building.

Because the damage is in the same place.

You called it a controlled demolition. And you’re right. Most experts agree

I said it indicates a controlled demolition

Because of the collapse pattern

Since the base of the tower is not shown in that video, we cannot know.

It takes weeks to lay the charges for s controlled demolition. It’s not just done in a few hours.

It was preplanned

You're not listening, but whatever.

Since you're going to keep cutting across me, I'm just going to go.

Continue then

Look up the iron-carbon phase diagram if you're interested.

No. I asked for the temps

I’m asking you to support your claims.