Message from @custer
Discord ID: 316614583622172683
WHAT ARE THE OPINIONS OF PROLES ON POLITICS?
A: GRAFFITI
here's a question though:
What is the benefit of a delineated and known caste system vs. a "de facto" caste system that functionally exists but isn't written down and enforced legally
a system without drawn borders does not exist
Right but do those borders have to be clear and legal
or can they be softer and cultural
THEY MUST BE CULTURAL AND LEGAL
But let's say they're only cultural
what's the argument for making them true legal boundaries
IF SOMETHING IS GOOD, WHY NOT MAKE IT LEGAL?
AND IF YOU DO NOT, IT WILL BE ATTACKED USING THE LAW
your second point is really good I think
that's what's happening
THIS IS THE PROBLEM WITH THE LAW
I PREFER RULE BY ARISTOCRATS
ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS
for example, supreme court upholding disparate impact challenges under the fair housing act
ENTIRELY
LAWYERS ARE NOT LEADERS
THEY ARE BUSINESSMEN WHO DEPEND ON A MONOPOLY
i'm going to law school
are you blind
I'm a lawyer
spiritually blind
nice
nice
how bad does it suck
I like my job. but i'm in a specific niche I made a lot of sacrifices to get into
yes
lawyering seems hard
and greasy
like a greasy sort of affair
did you sacrifice your soul
it's a big field. there are greasy areas and fine areas. diversity_is_racism is right about lawyers and leadership/policy. They shouldn't be making decisions.
I didn't sacrifice my soul. I'm doing exactly what I wanted to do and it's really interesting. But I know a lot of people who did.
lawyers who get paid to defend child molestors shouldn't make laws to begin with
or advocate or anything
i dunno man it seems like they take cash no matter what
why cant we just go back to public executions
like in the center of town square