Message from @Deleted User 57835c2c

Discord ID: 329662149788041217


2017-06-28 16:26:57 UTC  

anglo-saxon racialist christianity

2017-06-28 16:27:06 UTC  

dispensed by heavenly father to save the white race

2017-06-28 16:27:54 UTC  

yes

2017-06-28 16:28:06 UTC  

dispensed by God to save the only people left still created in His image

2017-06-28 16:33:06 UTC  

@Deleted User 57835c2c nobody really maintains the same level of conditioning / trainedness constantly. If you can pull yourself up sufficiently easily for the repetitions needed to climb, you probably don't need to do extra pullups to achieve that goal.

2017-06-28 16:33:21 UTC  

if you're climbing constantly you're doing those pullups anyway

2017-06-28 16:34:53 UTC  

but if you aren't an urbex guy or don't boulder or actually climb super frequently, then you have to simulate

2017-06-28 16:36:45 UTC  

yeah that's basically where I'm at

2017-06-28 16:37:00 UTC  

I want to be an urbex guy but I can't actually do it much so I do infinity pull ups among other things

2017-06-28 16:37:28 UTC  

why are you into polygamy

2017-06-28 16:37:33 UTC  

isnt one woman bad enough

2017-06-28 16:37:37 UTC  

because it's commanded by God

2017-06-28 16:37:43 UTC  

or so I believe

2017-06-28 16:38:03 UTC  

Isn't Vedic culture monogamous

2017-06-28 16:38:24 UTC  

indian? maybe. Vedic? no

2017-06-28 16:38:36 UTC  

every caste could marry sideways or downward

2017-06-28 16:39:09 UTC  

a brahmin could take a brahmin, kshatriya, vaisya and sudra for a wife. kshatriya could take kshatriya, vaisya and sudra, vaisya could take vaisya and sudra, sudra could have only one sudra

2017-06-28 16:39:21 UTC  

could I simulate polygamy by becoming a sperm donor

2017-06-28 16:39:28 UTC  

so the top/best had up to 4 wives and then each worse caste had progressively fewer

2017-06-28 16:39:32 UTC  

i don't want to deal with the extra females and kids

2017-06-28 16:39:41 UTC  

and it let the brahmins scalp the best genes off the lower ranks

2017-06-28 16:39:51 UTC  

although I take issue with that to an extent

2017-06-28 16:40:02 UTC  

No I mean

2017-06-28 16:40:06 UTC  

that practice is why indians are brown today instead of nordic like when they began

2017-06-28 16:40:12 UTC  

strictly metaphysically speaking

2017-06-28 16:40:20 UTC  

the concept of marriage itself is emasculating

2017-06-28 16:40:28 UTC  

women had to be monogamous

2017-06-28 16:40:33 UTC  

and exists only as a representation of the sacred union

2017-06-28 16:41:25 UTC  

so for a man to have multiple wives implies a sense of libertinism precisely for women, who get too much weight around household, and worst of all, around males

2017-06-28 16:41:26 UTC  

in mormonism it's a slightly different system, elaborated on here: https://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/132

2017-06-28 16:42:02 UTC  

tldr: men can have an unlimited number of wives, but if they do anything bad then their wives are confiscated and given to their moral superiors

2017-06-28 16:42:54 UTC  

they kick the man out of the church and confiscate his women and then breed new better men in his place

2017-06-28 16:43:49 UTC  

the concept of marriage itself is emasculating, your masterpiece @The Enlightened Shepherd

2017-06-28 16:44:12 UTC  

I don't think marriage is emasculating, men emasculate themselves by being pussies

2017-06-28 16:44:18 UTC  

they will not order their wives around or discipline their kids

2017-06-28 16:44:19 UTC  

it is to every wise man that ever lived

2017-06-28 16:44:35 UTC  

i cannot think of a peson i appreciate who didn't have a word or two against marriage

2017-06-28 16:44:54 UTC  

obviously, when given "relief"

2017-06-28 16:45:06 UTC  

marriage basically exists for the man to formally claim ownership of his women

2017-06-28 16:45:07 UTC  

injected with drugs?

2017-06-28 16:45:19 UTC  

that is the purpose of it, staking out your property