that was obviously the plan all along and it spells it out unambiguously if you actually read the fucking book

then guys who are Just So Nice(tm) read the book and turn around with bullshit explanations for why the book clearly stating to do polygamy and allow no nigs is actually telling them to love ERRBODY and only have one wife

anglo-saxon racialist christianity

dispensed by heavenly father to save the white race

yes

dispensed by God to save the only people left still created in His image

@Deleted User 57835c2c nobody really maintains the same level of conditioning / trainedness constantly. If you can pull yourself up sufficiently easily for the repetitions needed to climb, you probably don't need to do extra pullups to achieve that goal.

if you're climbing constantly you're doing those pullups anyway

but if you aren't an urbex guy or don't boulder or actually climb super frequently, then you have to simulate

yeah that's basically where I'm at

I want to be an urbex guy but I can't actually do it much so I do infinity pull ups among other things

why are you into polygamy

isnt one woman bad enough

because it's commanded by God

or so I believe

Isn't Vedic culture monogamous

indian? maybe. Vedic? no

every caste could marry sideways or downward

a brahmin could take a brahmin, kshatriya, vaisya and sudra for a wife. kshatriya could take kshatriya, vaisya and sudra, vaisya could take vaisya and sudra, sudra could have only one sudra

could I simulate polygamy by becoming a sperm donor

so the top/best had up to 4 wives and then each worse caste had progressively fewer

i don't want to deal with the extra females and kids

and it let the brahmins scalp the best genes off the lower ranks

although I take issue with that to an extent

No I mean

that practice is why indians are brown today instead of nordic like when they began

strictly metaphysically speaking

the concept of marriage itself is emasculating

women had to be monogamous

and exists only as a representation of the sacred union

so for a man to have multiple wives implies a sense of libertinism precisely for women, who get too much weight around household, and worst of all, around males

in mormonism it's a slightly different system, elaborated on here: https://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/132

tldr: men can have an unlimited number of wives, but if they do anything bad then their wives are confiscated and given to their moral superiors

they kick the man out of the church and confiscate his women and then breed new better men in his place

the concept of marriage itself is emasculating, your masterpiece @The Enlightened Shepherd

I don't think marriage is emasculating, men emasculate themselves by being pussies

they will not order their wives around or discipline their kids

it is to every wise man that ever lived

i cannot think of a peson i appreciate who didn't have a word or two against marriage

obviously, when given "relief"

marriage basically exists for the man to formally claim ownership of his women