Message from @amarkoff
Discord ID: 352151148758827008
STALIN WAS LIKE THE KHAN
Bolshevism was strongly anti-pacifist
Indeed.
A WINNER AT FIRST, BUT THEN COULD NOT MAKE A STABLE SOCIETY
INTERNAL PACIFISM
Sadly this is true.
"STOP STRUGGLING FOR MONEY AND POWER, WE ARE ALL EQUAL"
THAT IS WHY IT IS UNSTABLE
Ahh understood
EGALITARIANISM IS A VARIETY OF PACIFISM
WHEREAS HERE, WE PUT THE FIST BACK INTO PACIFISTS
I am still not clear on how stalinist national bolshevism is significantly different. At a glance it seems like tacking "Stalinist" onto "National bolshevism" is a patch to make inherently unworkable software operable, but please continue
This is because he was succeeded by a reformer and revisionist.
I AGREE @Deleted User 57835c2c
HE DID NOTHING NEW
JUST MAKE IT WORK IN A MILITARY STYLE
Stalin is what national bolsheviks want to go back to.
and what is that exactly
it's not marxism, it's just "in name only," so what to an outsider is it
strong state? weak state? what policies? what economics? who could enter? what was legal or illegal? I don't need a book on it, just a good executive summary of what makes it distinct
IMO stalinism and the politics of the Independent State of Croatia were quite similar
Planned economy.
however stalin had some key disadvantages
Loyalty to the party and the General Secretary.
one of which was that he refused to acknowledge his racialist tendencies which would have made the russian people rally behind him
what sort of equality?
Each satellite country would control their own people.
How is that not just national socialism
what your'e describing is at a glance identical
except NS at least specifies who can join in quite clear terms
There is a reason why National Bolshevism is considered to be National Socialism with a Russian focus.
national socialism is just national socialism though, whether done by japanese or germans or hindus
so why does it need a new name when russians do it
is it to feel more distinct/special or what?
Because National Socialism destroyed our country during the Great Patriotic War.
I see
so there is a need to rebrand the same idea out of generations old political resentment
Indeed.
even though the ideology is basically identical in all superficial senses
As a nationalist, I would oppose National Socialism at every turn if they used that name.