isn't that kind of contradictory?

Bolshevism also destroyed whatever cultures it was sent to

Hence why I prefer Stalinist bolshevism.

see my own people in Croatia

explain the difference to a non russian

🍔

Stalin was very much a "marxist" in name only.

Stalin was, despite being georgian, one of the greatest champions of the russian people to ever live

Indeed.

He helped perpetuate russian control over Ukraine even in the aftermath of a revolution whose natural result was what eventually happened after Kruschev and Gorbavhev

However stalin was also incapable of seeing where the natural dominion of Russians ended

BOLSHEVISM IS WHAT YOU GET WITH DEMOCRACY

He lifted Russia out of the feudalist state of affairs from before the revolution. Stalin created a new hierarchy. One that was sadly destroyed by the likes of Khrushchev.

PEOPLE LOVE THE IDEA OF PACIFISM AND FREE SHIT

IT ENDS BADLY EVERY TIME

STALIN WAS LIKE THE KHAN

Bolshevism was strongly anti-pacifist

Indeed.

A WINNER AT FIRST, BUT THEN COULD NOT MAKE A STABLE SOCIETY

INTERNAL PACIFISM

Sadly this is true.

"STOP STRUGGLING FOR MONEY AND POWER, WE ARE ALL EQUAL"

THAT IS WHY IT IS UNSTABLE

Ahh understood

EGALITARIANISM IS A VARIETY OF PACIFISM

WHEREAS HERE, WE PUT THE FIST BACK INTO PACIFISTS

I am still not clear on how stalinist national bolshevism is significantly different. At a glance it seems like tacking "Stalinist" onto "National bolshevism" is a patch to make inherently unworkable software operable, but please continue

This is because he was succeeded by a reformer and revisionist.

I AGREE @Deleted User 57835c2c

HE DID NOTHING NEW

JUST MAKE IT WORK IN A MILITARY STYLE

Stalin is what national bolsheviks want to go back to.

and what is that exactly

it's not marxism, it's just "in name only," so what to an outsider is it

strong state? weak state? what policies? what economics? who could enter? what was legal or illegal? I don't need a book on it, just a good executive summary of what makes it distinct

Strong state.

IMO stalinism and the politics of the Independent State of Croatia were quite similar

Planned economy.

however stalin had some key disadvantages

Loyalty to the party and the General Secretary.

one of which was that he refused to acknowledge his racialist tendencies which would have made the russian people rally behind him