so physiognomy

also, whether or not they are lighter than cardboard and have nonbrown eyes

then I look at things like height/weight/bodyfat%, any family history of medical illnesses, any evidence of actual athletic talent, coordination or toughness

eye color would figure into your theoretical maximum measurement

yes

i'm lighter than cardboard but brown eyes

I think my bone structure is pretty solid

I agree

wait i'm pretty sure I haven't posted any photos of me here

so... one problem is I haven't bothered to figure out a weight for each point I am looking for in the facial analysis, or how to weight face vs frame vs health

you've shown me photos before

of my brothers I think

I don't have them, but I remember thinking you looked like a grappler calisthenist type

oh

I look like them though

so really I have to fudge the overall rating for body as I don't have specific numbers, that's something that one day on a free afternoon I might fix

for example, if you are greensborough jock but with brown eyes, or type 1 diabetes, or you're 5'7", how many points come off?

currently I err on the side of generosity for anyone with the right physiognomy

someday it would be nice to standardize

the medical section would be difficult to standardize but possible

I'd have to actually list out all the major heritable diseases and figure out some kind of autistic rating system

that would probably be a week long grind of a project to just figure out

so there's really some wiggle room

What do I need to do to improve my hqi

for their mind, I just look at how quickly and effectively they solve problems (linear thinking), how proactively they acquire information (self study), and how flexible and intellectually honest their thought process is... for example, a guy who spent a long time developing some really well researched and well reasoned idea on some topic but could not handle hypotheticals of "what if the result here had been different?" then he would be suboptimal

I feel unqualified to tell you at the moment

Ok

so like in Mother's case, he effectively self studied some really accurate conclusions in some areas to achieve some results, but also showed evidence of rigidity/inflexibility

spirit... I basically look at a person's level of inner fire, their conviction to their moral code, and whether or not that moral code is actually any good or not

what do I mean by inner fire? Well it's simple, are they passionate, energetic people or not? I pretty much measure it based on how uncomfortable they are with doing normie things like working 9-5 in an office, talking about television shows with POC coworkers, using dating apps, etc

also by how much drive they have to be creative and how good those creative drives actually are

like a guy who is a living breathing fight club protagonist and feels almost morally compelled to write symphonies that are actually ground breakingly good, he would get a perfect score here

conviction to their moral code is obvious - if you're Wild and you're a vegan, do you actually do your diet? Yarfy bitches about dalitry but eats muffins his family buys, for example. How hardcore are you about whatever your thing is?

whether or not that moral code is actually any good or not, I rate pretty much based on how much its logical conclusion looks like space nazis

if it ends up looking like racist starship troopers, then they get good marks

humorously if a person has a shit ideology but poor conviction they get poor marks in both areas despite that actually making them less harmful to the world than they otherwise could be, i.e. an antifa who is too pussy to go to rallies

that's it, that's all that goes into an HQI

rate each of the three sections out of 100, then average all 3 and interpret as a letter grade

holy shit we had a tranny in here?

why are goblins of any sort ever tolerated anywhere? this is the right wing

keep the race pure