Message from @UOC
Discord ID: 379089474250080257
WAIT. I AM D GRADE OR B- GRADE?
so if you sent me your picture and you were the exact greensborough jock, your theoretical maximum would be 100%+80%+60%=240%, 240%/3 = 80%, B- overall
since I keep running into people who are high functioning yet held back in HQI by neuroses and moral issues, I am considering rendering it as current max vs theoretical optimum
a fraction with actual HQI on top and on the bottom it's their HQI if they had 100% in mind/spirit sections
so in the case of you and wild, the higher number on the bottom would reflect significant capacity to improve
whereas in the case of a POC or a genetic cripple or something, even the optimum number would be low
what goes into your determination of body/face
face: it's a checklist of bone structure from top of face to bottom, from a frontal and profile view
most if it comes out of the hard tissue section of Erectus Walks Amongst Us and also from Madison Grant's Passing of the Great Race
so physiognomy
also, whether or not they are lighter than cardboard and have nonbrown eyes
then I look at things like height/weight/bodyfat%, any family history of medical illnesses, any evidence of actual athletic talent, coordination or toughness
eye color would figure into your theoretical maximum measurement
yes
i'm lighter than cardboard but brown eyes
I think my bone structure is pretty solid
I agree
wait i'm pretty sure I haven't posted any photos of me here
so... one problem is I haven't bothered to figure out a weight for each point I am looking for in the facial analysis, or how to weight face vs frame vs health
you've shown me photos before
I don't have them, but I remember thinking you looked like a grappler calisthenist type
oh
I look like them though
so really I have to fudge the overall rating for body as I don't have specific numbers, that's something that one day on a free afternoon I might fix
for example, if you are greensborough jock but with brown eyes, or type 1 diabetes, or you're 5'7", how many points come off?
currently I err on the side of generosity for anyone with the right physiognomy
someday it would be nice to standardize
the medical section would be difficult to standardize but possible
I'd have to actually list out all the major heritable diseases and figure out some kind of autistic rating system
that would probably be a week long grind of a project to just figure out
so there's really some wiggle room
What do I need to do to improve my hqi
for their mind, I just look at how quickly and effectively they solve problems (linear thinking), how proactively they acquire information (self study), and how flexible and intellectually honest their thought process is... for example, a guy who spent a long time developing some really well researched and well reasoned idea on some topic but could not handle hypotheticals of "what if the result here had been different?" then he would be suboptimal
I feel unqualified to tell you at the moment
Ok
so like in Mother's case, he effectively self studied some really accurate conclusions in some areas to achieve some results, but also showed evidence of rigidity/inflexibility
spirit... I basically look at a person's level of inner fire, their conviction to their moral code, and whether or not that moral code is actually any good or not
what do I mean by inner fire? Well it's simple, are they passionate, energetic people or not? I pretty much measure it based on how uncomfortable they are with doing normie things like working 9-5 in an office, talking about television shows with POC coworkers, using dating apps, etc
also by how much drive they have to be creative and how good those creative drives actually are
like a guy who is a living breathing fight club protagonist and feels almost morally compelled to write symphonies that are actually ground breakingly good, he would get a perfect score here