Air is a fairly good insulator

@ZeroT Show me this please

They would not charge up again

Why do you think does your outled have a ground wire implemented?

I disagree, you have lead balls suspended in air and they will have a higher potential difference to the ones on the ground, creating a net charge, creating a coulomb force, not Gravity.

That does not make any sense my friend

You do not magically generate static energy from pulling something up in the air

Observe, the higher you are the higher the potential difference

https://images-ext-2.discordapp.net/external/CMgpVadBpUv02N0VwJdCLyWXgnCruzinoGSFJz1YjGc/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/419030767356739594/479026570413998080/Cavendish.gif
And look one is suspended in air, the other not

@ZeroT you wanted to say something.

Suspended on wood and insulative materials, NOT electrically isolated and even something wired directly to an earth copper bar in the ground would still have about 100 ohms of resistance

@Human Sheeple Your little graphic does not show anything

@ZeroT wait till you figure out space isnt even real.

Oh boy guys

the sun is acutlly much more closer then you think.

@Human Sheeple Therer is no magic nergy in the air man

When you pull something up

It's not magic dum dum, what do you think telluric batteries are

You give it potential energy

which is voltage

No its not dude

go back and learn 1st grade physics

look up voltage right now

You should do that

You do not generate voltage

By pulling something up

I suggest you read the article I send you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment

Cavendish yeah sure, you should read the ACTUAL gravity literature

Okay guys have a nice day

Rose et al (1969) Rotating torsion balance with servo control of mass spacing
Pontikis (1972a) Resonant torsion pendulum with various attracting masses
Renner (1974) Torsion pendulum in time-of-swing mode
Karagioz et al(1976) Evacuated torsion pendulum
Koldewyn (1976) Magnetically suspended torsion pendulum
Luther et al (1976) Rotating torsion balance
Mikkelsen and Newman (1977) geophysical and astronomical considerations
Yu et al (1978, 1979) Worden gravimeter
Sagitov et al (1979) Torsion pendulum with cylindrically shaped attracting and attracted masses
Page and Geilker (1981) Torsion pendulum with a measurement strategy governed by a quantum decision process
Karagioz et al (1981) Refinement of the results reported by Karagioz et al (1976)
Luther and Towler (1982) Torsion pendulum in time-of-swing mode
Oelfke (1984b) Torsion balance with small intermass spacing
Cohen and Taylor (1987) CODATA value for G from the 1986 adjustment of fundamental constants
Speake and Gillies (1987b) Evacuated beam balance with servo control
Liu et al (1987) Rotationally driven two-body interaction with suspended-coil sensing system
Goldblum (1987) Relative measurement of G using spin-polarized test masses
Karagioz et al (1987) Evacuated torsion balance with magnetic damper

de Boer et al (1987) Mercury-bearing-supported torsion balance with restoring torque supplied by quadrant electrometer
Dousse and Rheme (1987) Offset-mass torsion pendulum with servo-tracking
Moore et al (1988b) Evacuated beam balance
Saulnier and Frisch (1989) Ballistic motion of test masses on a torsion balance in accelerative field of depleted uranium
Muller et al (1990) Gravimetry at a pumped-storage hydroelectric reservoir
Zumberge et al (1991) Submarine-based geophysical measurement gravimetric profiles
Schurr et al (1991a, b, c) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator with external attracting mass
Yang et al (1991) Gravimetric measurement of a large cylindrical oil tank
Taylor et al (1992) PPK formalism and binary pulsar timing data
Schurr et al (1992a, b) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator
Oldham et al (1993) Gravimetry at a pumped-storage hydroelectric reservoir
Walesch et al (1994a, b) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator
Walesch et al (1995) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator
Fitzgerald and Armstrong (1995) Electrostatically nulled torsion balance
Hubler et al (1995) Electromagnetic balance used at a pumped storage reservoir
Meyer et al (1995) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator with external attracting mass
Fitzgerald (1995) Electrostatically nulled torsion balance
Michaelis et al (1995/96) Mercury-bearing-supported torsion balance with restoring torque
Bagley and Luther (1996) Torsion pendulum with Kuroda anelasticity correction

@ZeroT relax

Then explain to me why there are six orders of magnitude margin of error for G and senior physicists agree G probably isn't even a constant and the gravitational formula is missing variables

the 1995 one by FitzGerald even admitted coulomb forces fudged the results

I will go and study for my finals now

You guys just seem a bit ignorant for facts and you do not know how science works

Have a nice day guys 😄

Yes, maybe some education would have been good for you 😄