Okay, well, there is a simple experiment to prove gravity

I know you're lying already

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment @Deleted User

@ZeroT How have you eliminated static charge from that experiment?

Look, if static charge (its funny that you bring up that argument, not beliving in electrons that cause static charge) had something to do with that, you would never, and I rewpeat, NEVER have been able to measure and define the gravitational constant with this experiment

It is veeeeeery unlikely that everytime someone performed this experiment the same static charge was on the lead balls

Plus

Charge is real, I still don't know why you think you need invisible charge carrying elves

You can discharge metal balls easily with ground wires

Air is a fairly good insulator

@ZeroT Show me this please

They would not charge up again

Why do you think does your outled have a ground wire implemented?

I disagree, you have lead balls suspended in air and they will have a higher potential difference to the ones on the ground, creating a net charge, creating a coulomb force, not Gravity.

That does not make any sense my friend

You do not magically generate static energy from pulling something up in the air

Observe, the higher you are the higher the potential difference

https://images-ext-2.discordapp.net/external/CMgpVadBpUv02N0VwJdCLyWXgnCruzinoGSFJz1YjGc/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/419030767356739594/479026570413998080/Cavendish.gif
And look one is suspended in air, the other not

@ZeroT you wanted to say something.

Suspended on wood and insulative materials, NOT electrically isolated and even something wired directly to an earth copper bar in the ground would still have about 100 ohms of resistance

@Human Sheeple Your little graphic does not show anything

@ZeroT wait till you figure out space isnt even real.

Oh boy guys

the sun is acutlly much more closer then you think.

@Human Sheeple Therer is no magic nergy in the air man

When you pull something up

It's not magic dum dum, what do you think telluric batteries are

You give it potential energy

which is voltage

No its not dude

go back and learn 1st grade physics

look up voltage right now

You should do that

You do not generate voltage

By pulling something up

I suggest you read the article I send you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment

Cavendish yeah sure, you should read the ACTUAL gravity literature

Okay guys have a nice day

Rose et al (1969) Rotating torsion balance with servo control of mass spacing
Pontikis (1972a) Resonant torsion pendulum with various attracting masses
Renner (1974) Torsion pendulum in time-of-swing mode
Karagioz et al(1976) Evacuated torsion pendulum
Koldewyn (1976) Magnetically suspended torsion pendulum
Luther et al (1976) Rotating torsion balance
Mikkelsen and Newman (1977) geophysical and astronomical considerations
Yu et al (1978, 1979) Worden gravimeter
Sagitov et al (1979) Torsion pendulum with cylindrically shaped attracting and attracted masses
Page and Geilker (1981) Torsion pendulum with a measurement strategy governed by a quantum decision process
Karagioz et al (1981) Refinement of the results reported by Karagioz et al (1976)
Luther and Towler (1982) Torsion pendulum in time-of-swing mode
Oelfke (1984b) Torsion balance with small intermass spacing
Cohen and Taylor (1987) CODATA value for G from the 1986 adjustment of fundamental constants
Speake and Gillies (1987b) Evacuated beam balance with servo control
Liu et al (1987) Rotationally driven two-body interaction with suspended-coil sensing system
Goldblum (1987) Relative measurement of G using spin-polarized test masses
Karagioz et al (1987) Evacuated torsion balance with magnetic damper