Message from @Qthulhu42
Discord ID: 399253409296809984
hypothetical: there is enough food to barely feed 20 people. In an attempt get this food, there are 10 Asians working as a team, 10 blacks working as a team, and 2 whites working as lone individuals. Who starves?
if you can't understand that then you should move on
q you seem like a lolbertairan, read hoppe plz and pull your head out of your dishonest ass
even in a libertarian society guys like him would get steamrolled as others formed voluntary unions and voluntarily free associated until they choked out his neighborhoods and industries
I see your point, but not all groups are racially discriminatory. If the white people integrated with, say, the blacks, they would perform better
would they?
why?
The group they are in is larger
what if the other group is better coordinated?
let's say the 10 asians understand english fine but communicate in chinese
actually wait
let's take it to the logical conclusion
bigger group = more gooder
Then, if they are racially exclusive, the blacks are still better than being a lone wolf, and if they're not, then the whites can choose between the two
so if they ignored racial lines and formed a bigger group, they could guarantee their 20 get fed while the last 2 starve
so why don't the 10 asians join with the 10 blacks to make a giant POC-only group, and all team up to make sure their 20 eat and the 2 whites starve?
what would either 10 member group have in incentive to take or tolerate the whites?
ex stop talking to the guy, he isnt interested in answers, he thinks he knows them. he is trying the socratic method on you but he isnt doing it right and you're not going to convince him of anything because he isnt interested in answes, he is interested in making you exhausted so you'll give up
London’s Police Commissioner says rape gangs have “been part of our society for centuries”
Sure, but how is white nationalism gonna help the 2 whites in that case?
wait hold on
there's more
the 10 asians have an incentive to do whatever favors the asians over the blacks or the whites
because any collective (i.e. above their own racial group) decision that ultimately favors asians would favor them individually
and the other 9 asians in his group are related to him
they are his cousins and nephews and brothers
is he going to let his nephew starve because he thought the white guy was talented or whatever?
same situation with the blacks
white nationalism wouldn't be a practical solution in that case without knowing specifics to develop strategy
but it tells you where your incentives should lie if you aren't autistic, atomized or schizoid personality disorder
you have to be purposely retarded to not understand at this point
lots of people realized last year what I realized as early as 5th grade, that's why this happened https://cbsnews3.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2017/08/12/8cc34d2e-6303-4883-944d-59eb0c8fe1dd/resize/620x465/e2ac5463c6a19da8ed23178af09fdf15/charlottesville-nazi-rally-2017-08-12t080132z-1893804928-rc1223b41d70-rtrmadp-3-virginia-protests.jpg
"Hey if we don't make sure whites get some damned jobs then we are going to end up eating ramen in the back of moving vans when we're 45! YOU WILL NOT REPLACE US"
my prayers have been answered
laura loomer isn't a conservative or a nationalist
this is not rocket science. Either you understand by now, or else you are retarded, or else you don't want to understand
what the fuck is this
the sound quality is really bad
not loomer's