Is this server _exclusively_ for those with alt-right views

My wha

Does alt-right imply ethnostatism?

Okay

When you say 'white identity', is that a cultural thing? Does a white person who had black adoptive parents have that? What about someone whose parents are of different races?

I see

Can the case for ethnostatism be put concisely?

Well, it's quite a nebulous term

The left-media are very quick to label people who aren't necessarily ethnostatists as alt-right

My current understanding of altright is basically Richard spencer and thegoldenone

Which is why I come here.

What does 'self-determination' entail? Why is it desirable, and how does an ethnostate help achieve it?

But why are 'white people' a homogeneous group?

Why not sports team fans, religions, etc

When you say white people need to secure their share, what if a small group of white people gain a lot of wealth and influence while the majority do not? The group as a whole may still be benefited.

I'm not talking about wealth inequality generally here

I'm just asking what it means for a race to secure their share

What about them though?

But what does 'securing' mean? Some white people own some of them?

White

I'm not sure what definition of the term you're using here

No

No

No?

What is your point here

So when you say there's not enough to go around, and white people need to secure their share, you mean this kind of segregation needs to be implemented?

It seems strange to talk about exclusively white businesses in a country that is exclusively white anyway. That's where I got confused, but now I think I get it.

But that comes back to the question, why do races need to be separated?

Why is it bad?

And racial diversity? Or all diversity?

What about diversity of ideas?

That makes sense, but it seems more related to culture than genetics. Isn't that where these standards come from?

When you say standards, do you mean social customs, rituals, mannerisms etc.?

I enjoy this name

I want to pursue my own individual interests

But my issue is, I don't see how furthering the interests of white people necessarily benefits individual white people - for example, creating more opportunities for white people in x industry I am not involved in

Then that would probably be in my _genetic_ self-interest, but not all white people have a relatedness factor that big

It is, but my evolutionarily inbuilt altruism has little reason to work towards people not in my immediate family unless it gives me some reciprocal benefit, e.g. trade, virtue

No, but I wouldn't let a white man rape a black woman.

My point here is that the difference between me and a random white guy and me and a random black guy is fairly insignificant

Why would certain races be inherently violent?

How would that occur evolutionarily

Shouldn't we then select for nonviolent genes, not skin colour genes?

This honestly just sounds like what I hear from bad communists

I agree, but how do you tell what race a person is?

Any community would serve me just as well as a race, would it not?

I'm not sure how the discrimination of other groups is relevant to the success of a nondiscriminatory group

And surely, if it's a community I choose, rather than am born into, I can go with the one that serves me best

I see your point, but not all groups are racially discriminatory. If the white people integrated with, say, the blacks, they would perform better

The group they are in is larger

Then, if they are racially exclusive, the blacks are still better than being a lone wolf, and if they're not, then the whites can choose between the two

Sure, but how is white nationalism gonna help the 2 whites in that case?

They already fuckd