Message from @profagonist
Discord ID: 400455276181848065
@Hagel, you said enough in three sentences to convince me that you talk about Allied version Nazism, and not original German National Socialism. Oh don't mean to be rude. Let's talk about this later,I gotta run first.
In summary, though, the three mistakes are thus: the general concept of Aryan vis a vis race, the economic model was not modern socialism or welfare for the lazy and useless, the idea that the plan was to conquer the world. You should read Buckanan's and Stolfi's books on this. However, this mistakes and distortions are apparent simply by reading Hitler directly and analyzing the situations in a detached way.
Tons of mixed race Jews in the army
@Josh yep, cause Hitler was never arguing for extermination or conquering the world originally. This is only a mystery or "kooky" if your premise is Hitler was crazy and "evil".
Even if we accept the Jew Allies' premise that Hitler was an unhinged maniac; National Socialism is not defined by Hitler alone
what was wrong with the racial conception of aryanism
Hitler, theoretically, could he as crazy as they say, and it wouldn't really mean anything. It's just a personal attack against one man
@Exilarch. Right, I do not know you. But I am familiar with the ideas you are handling. I am talking about those, not about you. Try to focus on that, nobody is attacking you.
Hitler's party wasn't true national socialism, as it wasn't even socialist
@profagonist later. No, I didn't say it was wrong or right, I am saying it is more complex than the average Joe comprehend. The key to certain attitudes and discrepancies in Hitler's rhetoric is in Mein Kampf. I'm saying this treatment is of Aryan was more complex than Nordic blonds, period, and had a lot of baggage by then already. One should understand that Hitler both placed his faith, but not trust, in the people, believing ultimately in the principle of leadership, not just the "all men are equal" of Communism or Americanism.
phone
I know what the party ran on
and I'm against it
will address soon
Address my actual points
I am against real NS, and against HItlerism.
@Hagel I Wil, I'm just about to leave, hence I said, LATER! Ideology solidifies, is the problem. Even from the time of Mein Kampf, Hitler distinguishes between ideology as a short term tool, differentiated from GOALS and from TRUTH.
See ya.
Yes you did, you said it was a mistake
"It is not truth that matters, but victory"
those awful chinese
```Pelagius - Today at 1:51 AM
His Christianity hid a wide Paganism, not atheism. Take from me, an actual atheist.```
He mocked Himmler's paganism. He would have called him a larpagan today. He also said that re establishing the worship of Wotan would be foolish.
HOWDY @Pelagius
the return of DARG and evil. @Pelagius
THE RETURN OF DARKNESS AND EVIL
GLORIOUS
best puns in the game
@Hagel. I know more than one refined pagan who would make fun of larping pagans.
It happens within each group all the time, the superstitious and the refined thinkers don't get along like that.
Again, not saying he was right or wrong, but I am all for distinguishing what it is he really was stating.
Most Christians make fun of the other brands of Christianity.
I'm not saying he was. CHRISTIAN. Obviously he wasn't.
@Hagel could you restate your 3 or 4or 5 statements again, clearly so I can write a response for you?
LARPING IS GREAT WHEN PEOPLE ARE AWARE THEY ARE LARPING
OTHERWISE IT IS