there is

slavs out of USA

possible exception for czechs

slavs out of eastern europe

germanics in

For that matter, the fact that there is an "Irish Question", does not mean the J.Q. is disproved.

slavs 2 mongolia

Czechs have hot chicks, besides that, I see no particular excellence.

they don't seem too different than bavarians

just have the misfortune of speaking slavic language

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/There-is-no-Judeo-Christian-tradition-533166

lots of good czechs in texas and the midwest

Whites have a more dire problem: The liberals want to behead alphas and the noble on principle, but the conservatives (of any stripe) are too inclusive of dross with the only requirement being that they agree ideologically.

That means that there is no cleansing force towards excellence and elitism in the U.S. Caucasian movement ("White" is a really annoying term).

I.e. the U.S. Caucasian movement seems to allow any pale-skinned, retard. A bunch of fat tards dressed in Confederate clothes. And then a bunch of chads. God damn it, is that the core?

western european

better term than caucasian, too broad

and yes the right is filled with retards

always has been

fringe politics attracts losers

@devolved Western European narrows it down more. You are right, it is better.
But still not good enough. Here is where we start to find SOME sense in using the term "Aryan", except that "Aryan" includes other ethnic groups, to the chagrin of many "white power" guys, and the NS dross back in the day.

"Western European is a geographic reference, but there are several aboriginal groups in Western Europe who do not really belong in this "Western European" group.

Like the real indigenous peoples of Ireland and Scottland (not the ones with the semitic-kind of mixture that @diversity_is_racism refers to as today's "Irish people")

or the ancient natives of Spain, and portions of southern France.

Pagans before pagans before pagans. The guys who were there since forever.

These guys do not belong to your "Western Civilization", yet they have always been in Western Europe.

WESTERN EUROPEAN = NORDIC-GERMANIC

then Nordic-Germanic is the proper term. And it does not include many U.K. caucasians.

This is interesting, at the end of the day: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-34175224

@diversity_is_racism , interesting to note: THE INFAMOUS GUY is SARDINIAN. one of those ancient European groups.

AN INTERESTING GROUP FOR SURE

THEY SEEM CONNECTED

AGREED ALSO ON THE BASQUE CURIOSITY

@Pelagius ,

Some disagreements with original NS, and Hitlerist NS:

Socialism as an economic model

Arabs being more Aryan than Slavs

Fake Christianity for political reasons

Considering a return to the cult of Wotan "foolish"

A desire for one ethnicity to conquer the entire continent / world

A blurry, perhaps even underdeveloped sense of why the Germans are great, should propagate themselves, etc; A blurry sense of the reason why Alexander was different from other conquerors, the higher reason for the conquest beyond self preservation and propagation. Philosophy precedes politics, and the philosophy was, from the beginning, flawed at worst and fragmented and self contradictory between the factions at best

Best wishes,
v0ddy

Teutonic is a good word that used to be used to describe da white man

I think the true natives of western Europe belong in the western european group

The R1b people

And they are not nordic-germanic

Ok, @Hagel , these are my responses.
As per Adolf Hitler's views (his words) and organization: https://pastebin.com/xCUZY1mC

In regards to philosophy-ideology: National Socialism is not in the least a philosophy. Hitler was keen on making that clear. It was an ideology: a tool for purpose. Philosophy does not build reality, but moves and inspires in the long term in a different way. National Socialism has no philosophy in the proper sense.
A little thing that may be found if one actually takes the time what Hitler actually writes: He saw National Socialism as something to be surpassed, as a tool that was meant for Germans back then to address their contemporary predicament.

IF one reads *Mein Kampf* to the very end, and taking heed of his opinions, one finds these things stated very clearly.