Message from @Josh
Discord ID: 410984536269389835
Yeah
i saw thru all that sort of shit as a teen why can't they
Statistically, most people are un-thinking laborers
yup
I heard that smart people aren't smart because they have great ideas, but rather they have a high volume of thoughts, while dumb people barely have maybe 1-2 conscious thoughts a day, and spend 99% of their time just trying not to wander into traffic and die
they try to make it from venereal disease A to venereal disease B
one of hte cats just came in the room, looked at me, walked around the room a bit, looked at me again, then left
cats are strange
imagine being stuck indoors all day and find going into a room you haven't been in in 24 hours to be stimulating
I agree with Gwyn 100%
most normal people are entirely passive, until someone asks them a question or their boss makes them solve a problem, their brains entirely switch off. It's probably evolutionary for dalit POC countries, you probably consume less calories when your brain is set to "push to talk," which is advantageous when you live in a starving third world shithole. Being that low IQ causes you to make your third world shithole even more retarded and starving, which further incentivizes poverty of thought. A vicious cycle of dalitry
<:pajaCmon:385913274383728657> 🚬
they're meant to take orders
yeah
but IMO they should be decreased as a proportion of population
I see them as NPCs, pseudo-life that exists to react to active people like me with genuine volition
@Exilarch >you probably consume less calories when your brain is set to "push to talk,"
This is proven, you burn less calories watching television than you do when you're asleep...
woah
@MentalSyntaxError I love cats 🙃 🙃
In 2011 it was more per hour sleeping 😡
poast link in good chat
http://www.howmany.wiki/calories-burned/Calories-burned_watching+tv_an_hour
Interesting stuff, there's a lot of calculators if you don't trust this one
hahahaha
so this is something interesting. I looked up the average cost of college attendance, it was 37k per year. Therefore it costs on average 148k for a 4 year degree. Then I looked up the median US income and it was 59k. The average college graduate income was 50k, but the average STEM graduate's was 65k. If median income is 59k, then college costs not only 148k of loans, but also 50 x 4=236k of lost wages, for a grand total of 384k. Meanwhile, assuming you work 40 years, you would earn an extra 6 x 40=240k for having a STEM degree, but with inflation that will be greatly diminished anyway. Even if there was no such thing as inflation, why would it be a good idea at all to pay 384k to make 240k over 40 years? What kind of shitty return on investment is that? Why do boomers think this is at all a good idea?
not if you go to BYU
...
devolved you are such a fucking retard dude
50% of young adults go to college
there is this huge systemic exploitation of an entire generation going on, I just dumped a fuckload of math to prove it, and all you have to say is "lol but our school is cheap" as if that solves the problem?
I hope you get your head kicked in by antifa at your next retard protest
literally retards like you are why all smart people flee from the right wing
the right wing is entirely comprised of only either complete retards or antisocial geniuses, because everyone moderately intelligent in the 110-125 IQ bracket sees people like you being right wingers, concludes that only a retard would do it and becomes a hard leftist
you are what we need to purge to save our movement
ok buddy
@here sound off on the above
I dunno what does Bruce Charlton have to say about this?
it's all relative to the kind of work you do, plus what's the alternative? most high level professional work /STEM field jobs requires a degree of some sort
STEM averages 65k