Message from @e.
Discord ID: 423828595044122624
"if all we do is concentrate smart people in their own space, it won't be any better" is false
THERE ARE TWO QUESTIONS HERE:
A. THE EXPERIENCE OF THE INTELLIGENT
B. EFFECTSON THE WORLD AT LARGE
IF YOU WANT A SAFE SPACE, THAT CAN BE ACHIEVED
BUT THEN YOU MARGINALIZE YOURSELVES
AND, BY BECOMING WITHDRAWN, ESSENTIALLY CREATE THE CONDITIONS FOR REPETITION
AT SOME POINT, NO ONE HAS ANYTHING ALL THAT MUCH NEW TO SAY TO ANYONE ELSE
SO ENTROPY WINS
spergs who believe in entropy believe it always wins
people who believe your philosophy believe nothing is new anyway
I DISAGREE ON THAT FRONT
ENTROPY IS PART OF LIFE
ONE CAN REGULATE IT TO SOME DEGREE
BY NOT BEING QUITE SO DISORDERLY
End the world
SHOTGUN SUICIDE: https://vimeo.com/260170446
❤ MORGAN ROOF ❤
for some reason this link is available on here, but it doesn't show up on the website.
now it doesn't exist. Glad I got to watch it before it went down.
Morgan is a KWEEN
Hopefully she gets impregnated soon
Wew
I don’t know who that was but the video was a real trip
Anti-degeneracy movements tended to fail because outside force crushed them or because people with no actual experience of what diversity was like said ‘what’s so wrong about this thing hurr’
But now that a generation’s grown up under the thumb of progressivism, they know what’s up and what the issue is
And I think an exclusive space for smarts to talk is a good idea, but need to think about what message/image to present to the populace
As well as not letting it be controlled by the group of current media masters
Using unorthodox channels is one option, but the whole point is that those have little currency with the general population
Whenever you have "distribution of knowledge" you ought to be suspicious
Whenever someone "educates masses" you immediately must smell Stalin in there
Knowledge is something that by nature demands to "tread carefully", it is something with its own gravity, it demands seekers, it lies there, concealed, ambiguous, cryptic
In the past, knowledge was concealed in spiritual teaching, and its banal and simplified distribution was outright forbidden
To reduce knowledge, and this goes for academia as well, to mere quotation of publicly available informational pollution is the sign of this age. Democracy, democracy everywhere
Too true
All crusaders for the publicity and wide distribution of knowledge are subconscious pioneers of plebeian ambitions, like Martin Luther for example
But then, what to do about ‘the masses’
That question itself is subversive if taken as a basic presumption