Message from @Horns
Discord ID: 428691200141295616
Pretty much everybody in the Right who is from the IT sector or is a Computer Scientist/Engineer by profession
Pretty much everybody who runs a Youtube channel
Jack Donovan's rejection of the "alt-right" speaks well of him. Rife with charlatanism and pathological posturing. All "tawk"
Jack Donovan has as far as I know, remained loyal to things that one is to remain loyal to - an anti-egalitarian worldview and to White Americans in a cultural, rather than a purely demographic sense
Other than that, what is there to be "embraced" about the Alt-Right from such an abstract perspective? It is enough not to have a social network profile and you are out of the ALt-Right
wake up people - ALt-Right exists on social networks and blogs ! and that's it !
What does even constitute being "in" the Alt-Right? Exchanging replies with the entire editorial staff of Daily Stormer about "the movement" ? Allowing every misfit to berate you in person?
You're alt-right if you embrace goals beyond any reasonable ability to achieve in order to justify incompetence and an inability to do the hard work of taking actual positive steps
It is disingenuous/straight lying to claim donovan is quietly homosexual.
He is openly gay, wrote for salon (or some similar site) about it, and has come close to asserting that homosexual monogamy is as meaningful as is traditional marriage.
He is Andrew Sullivan as a pagan.
He also is a tattoo artist and therefore should be decapitated by a white-robed crusader.
HOMOSEXUAL MONOGAMY IS A BIG IMPROVEMENT OVER HOMOSEXUAL PROMISCUITY
ENCOURAGING HOMOSEXUALS TO BE MORE RIGHT-WING IS NOT A BAD THING
I question that.
I THINK DONOVAN HAS GOOD INSTINCTS
HE MAY BE WORKING THROUGH SOME STRUGGLES OF HIS OWN
It reduces the conception of marriage to simply as a category of partnership.
Instead of one in which the goal is the union of the individuals involved to a point of spiritual union, along with procreation.
Homosexuals can do neither.
"monogamy" as a term did not exist until modern times, as far as I know.
A man was either married to a woman, or was a bachelor.
Non-marriage "monogamy" was a sin.
Homosexuality as impulse, in addition to action, was a sin.
It was a sin regardless of how many people one did it with.
Because what was important was that being homosexual itself was a sin.
And one can reject Christian morals without negating my first point.
Way of Men is great
@diversity_is_racism give @Fashional Brocialist II the metal tag
@devolved That liveleak vid was mortifying. I am never eating fast food chicken again.
@Horns Do you know any gays? Some are more so into "man" than "men." Worrying about invisible relationships between two men who are the same way is counterproductive. Worrying about the one that actually want "gay marriage (which doesn't exist)" and working as advocates is what will be productive.
@Horns I WAS SPEAKING OF HOMOSEXUAL MONOGAMY, NOT MARRIAGE
HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE IS NONSENSE
@diversity_is_racism Hey. Hardly see comments from you.
@Draugra SORRY HAVE BEEN A BIT TIED UP
BUT SOMETIMES I APPEAR
LIKE FLATULENCE IN A CROWDED ELEVATOR
Except more pleasant.
I mean, you don't even want genocide or anything. Just exile. You're a very nice Fascist.
Well, Monarchist.