Message from @ϟϟ✠Dan✠The✠Oracle✠ϟϟ
Discord ID: 370058443316264960
on the contrary, it seems that i understand this issue far better than you but you cant not understand that because you have yet to learn aobut it, once you do you may then realise my point
Theist means belief in a god or gods. That is the only qualifer. You are saying that someone who has a god they do not believe in makes them atheist (which, at least to make a coherent argument i'm going to assume you meant towards a particular god). But in order to be atheist in a particular situation, obviously they could not be theist at the same time. So does theist dissolve when confronted in a particular scenario? Obviously not, because the belief in a god does not dissapear even in reference to another god. So belief in a god is A, another is B, etc. Atheist = any letter. This does not mean ALL letters.
also
I understand that you just stole this concept from someone else, but like you this person was also proven wrong
You need to develop your ability to think for yourself instead of just reciting from (ironically) better men
lol
Theism is a definitive statment; meaning that if someone had "allergies", just because they are not allergic to all things does not make them have "allergies"
does not mean they do not have*
what you are failing to grasp is that athiest is just another religious position
I do understand that
but that doesnt make sense
because
theism and atheism is just 2 sides of the same coin
and i reject that whole coin
so put it in simple terms you may grasp
If you are allergic (theist) to things (gods) in particular, it does not mean that you do not have allergies (belief in a god) when confronting things you are not allergic to (other gods).
do you not understand?
Show me where those two are not the same thing please.
okj
using yourt logic
asumming that theism is the state of having allergies
to one or more things in particular
if you are allergic to say penicillin you can also be not allergic to cat hair
sure
so it makes you both allergic (theist) and a-alergic (atheist)
however
the state of having allergies does not change
just because you beleive in one god or gods does not stop you from disbelieving in a god or gods
and not having allergies to a particular thing does not make you a-alergic
you are making false equivelencies
thats exactly my point... but in this case "allergies" is (religion)
you dont understand the difference between being an allergic to a particular thing and having allergies
those are two different things
I understand your argument it is just wrong because you are conflating non-sequitors
You STILL have allergies if you are not allergic to cat hair
because if you are allergic to anything, you have allergies
you dont just
no longer have allergies around cat hair
yes, but the equivalence here is religion
yeah but you would have to prove that someone has faith in NO gods to be atheist