Message from @ϟϟ✠Dan✠The✠Oracle✠ϟϟ
Discord ID: 370059010243690506
because
theism and atheism is just 2 sides of the same coin
and i reject that whole coin
so put it in simple terms you may grasp
If you are allergic (theist) to things (gods) in particular, it does not mean that you do not have allergies (belief in a god) when confronting things you are not allergic to (other gods).
do you not understand?
Show me where those two are not the same thing please.
okj
using yourt logic
and allergic
asumming that theism is the state of having allergies
to one or more things in particular
if you are allergic to say penicillin you can also be not allergic to cat hair
sure
so it makes you both allergic (theist) and a-alergic (atheist)
however
the state of having allergies does not change
just because you beleive in one god or gods does not stop you from disbelieving in a god or gods
and not having allergies to a particular thing does not make you a-alergic
you are making false equivelencies
you dont understand the difference between being an allergic to a particular thing and having allergies
those are two different things
I understand your argument it is just wrong because you are conflating non-sequitors
You STILL have allergies if you are not allergic to cat hair
because if you are allergic to anything, you have allergies
you dont just
no longer have allergies around cat hair
yes, but the equivalence here is religion
yeah but you would have to prove that someone has faith in NO gods to be atheist
theism if you like
not-theist
if you have a theist
reguardless of the situation you are always a theist
if you are around nothing but cats
you are still allergic to penecilin
you still have allergies
i understand your point perfectly, i just reject it
because i am anti-theist
not athiest
well then you were wrong earlier