Message from @AutumnFire
Discord ID: 370058089170468874
and explain how you are actually that same person
meno's slave
&
try and see how you are basically the same thing
You are basically like a greek slave who thinks he understands a concept, but doesnt really
thats the tl;dr version because i know you probably arent going to be able to conprehend the texts
yes was just resading it now, philosophy is cancer tbh... but if i understand what i just quickly browsed through tis bascially that people can be led to the correct answer, and that somehow proves they had the right answer all along?
The problem is that you don't have the logical foundation to understand a lot of these concepts. Like dunning-kruger, which is a psychological concept used by people in arguments who really don't want to be troubled with having to logically explain their argument, so they just point out that there exists something in where people have a cognitive bias, with a massive lack of proof. It's the "I am very smart" version of calling someone a Nazi.
On your original point
Atheist
on the contrary, it seems that i understand this issue far better than you but you cant not understand that because you have yet to learn aobut it, once you do you may then realise my point
Theist means belief in a god or gods. That is the only qualifer. You are saying that someone who has a god they do not believe in makes them atheist (which, at least to make a coherent argument i'm going to assume you meant towards a particular god). But in order to be atheist in a particular situation, obviously they could not be theist at the same time. So does theist dissolve when confronted in a particular scenario? Obviously not, because the belief in a god does not dissapear even in reference to another god. So belief in a god is A, another is B, etc. Atheist = any letter. This does not mean ALL letters.
also
I understand that you just stole this concept from someone else, but like you this person was also proven wrong
You need to develop your ability to think for yourself instead of just reciting from (ironically) better men
lol
Theism is a definitive statment; meaning that if someone had "allergies", just because they are not allergic to all things does not make them have "allergies"
does not mean they do not have*
what you are failing to grasp is that athiest is just another religious position
I do understand that
because
theism and atheism is just 2 sides of the same coin
and i reject that whole coin
so put it in simple terms you may grasp
If you are allergic (theist) to things (gods) in particular, it does not mean that you do not have allergies (belief in a god) when confronting things you are not allergic to (other gods).
do you not understand?
Show me where those two are not the same thing please.
okj
using yourt logic
and allergic
asumming that theism is the state of having allergies
to one or more things in particular
if you are allergic to say penicillin you can also be not allergic to cat hair
sure
so it makes you both allergic (theist) and a-alergic (atheist)
however
the state of having allergies does not change
just because you beleive in one god or gods does not stop you from disbelieving in a god or gods
and not having allergies to a particular thing does not make you a-alergic
you are making false equivelencies