Message from @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

Discord ID: 556205689589071902


2019-03-15 19:59:16 UTC  

Like not just average

2019-03-15 19:59:19 UTC  

Not just not bad

2019-03-15 19:59:24 UTC  

Like actually a decent mod

2019-03-15 19:59:29 UTC  

I respect it.

2019-03-15 19:59:41 UTC  

It's verifiable bybus

2019-03-15 19:59:43 UTC  

Was it two wells? Was it a well and a stick? Or was it two sticks?
***PICK ONE!!!***

2019-03-15 19:59:59 UTC  

(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿)👍
Ŧlคt єคгtђ ✔

welcome..to __ICE WALL server__
█░░╦─╦╔╗╦─╔╗╔╗╔╦╗╔╗░░█
█░░║║║╠─║─║─║║║║║╠─░░█
█░░╚╩╝╚╝╚╝╚╝╚╝╩─╩╚╝░░█

2019-03-15 19:59:59 UTC  

Any shadow angles relative to vertical

2019-03-15 20:00:05 UTC  

that is besides the point tho, the thing that matters is that the test is correct

2019-03-15 20:00:13 UTC  

@Ætos Thank you! 😋

2019-03-15 20:00:48 UTC  

It can be a well or a stick, it doesn't matter dude

2019-03-15 20:00:58 UTC  

Seriously dude, you are one of the mods there where I’m like, “Oh thank God, I can say hello without being questioned or banned.”

2019-03-15 20:01:00 UTC  

@Finsie wrong. It assumes a globe before it was conducted. Therefore, inaccurate and biased.

2019-03-15 20:01:16 UTC  

I mean if you can prove you assumption

2019-03-15 20:01:26 UTC  

it gives it more stability

2019-03-15 20:01:45 UTC  

It is you who needs to prove Eratosthenes was real and his tests were accurate.

2019-03-15 20:01:51 UTC  

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 the results he got are impossible on a flat plane with a local sun

2019-03-15 20:02:11 UTC  

are yall still mad because of memeoulus

2019-03-15 20:02:21 UTC  

You can't make assumptions and use the results to perpetuate your assumptions. You're using false math that could literally do anything.

2019-03-15 20:02:24 UTC  

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 just becus the dude did or didnt live, doesnt mean that the test can't be done today

2019-03-15 20:02:50 UTC  

@BurDur You literally cannot make that determination. Explain your logic.

2019-03-15 20:03:30 UTC  

***THE FUCKING TEST ASSUMES A GLOBE PRIOR TO ANYTHING!!!*** You cannot use it in real science.

2019-03-15 20:03:36 UTC  

Yeah with math. It's easy @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

2019-03-15 20:03:41 UTC  

Here is how

2019-03-15 20:03:53 UTC  

Math does not reflect reality

2019-03-15 20:03:58 UTC  

Math is math

2019-03-15 20:04:01 UTC  

except it does

2019-03-15 20:04:04 UTC  

It's a tool

2019-03-15 20:04:04 UTC  

?

2019-03-15 20:04:09 UTC  

Except it doesn't.

2019-03-15 20:04:15 UTC  

I mean

2019-03-15 20:04:19 UTC  

The angle of shadows as a function of distance from the equator on a flat plane would be tan(d/h)

2019-03-15 20:04:20 UTC  

put up 1 finger

2019-03-15 20:04:22 UTC  

put up 1 more

2019-03-15 20:04:24 UTC  

das 2

2019-03-15 20:04:27 UTC  

This is cringe as fuck

2019-03-15 20:04:30 UTC  

You can create an entire cosmos with math. One that has no reflection in reality.

2019-03-15 20:04:40 UTC  

But on a globe it would be d/r.

2019-03-15 20:04:44 UTC  

The earth is a globe suck it flatties <:snapsnap:484956825863585792>

2019-03-15 20:04:49 UTC  

So it does ***NOT*** reflect reality.

2019-03-15 20:04:50 UTC  

Completely different angles would result.