Message from @Finsie
Discord ID: 556205580470059009
Mad Phil is a actually a good 24/7mod
Like not just average
Not just not bad
Like actually a decent mod
I respect it.
It's verifiable bybus
Was it two wells? Was it a well and a stick? Or was it two sticks?
***PICK ONE!!!***
(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿)👍
Ŧlคt єคгtђ ✔
welcome..to __ICE WALL server__
█░░╦─╦╔╗╦─╔╗╔╗╔╦╗╔╗░░█
█░░║║║╠─║─║─║║║║║╠─░░█
█░░╚╩╝╚╝╚╝╚╝╚╝╩─╩╚╝░░█
Any shadow angles relative to vertical
that is besides the point tho, the thing that matters is that the test is correct
@Ætos Thank you! 😋
It can be a well or a stick, it doesn't matter dude
Seriously dude, you are one of the mods there where I’m like, “Oh thank God, I can say hello without being questioned or banned.”
@Finsie wrong. It assumes a globe before it was conducted. Therefore, inaccurate and biased.
I mean if you can prove you assumption
it gives it more stability
It is you who needs to prove Eratosthenes was real and his tests were accurate.
@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 the results he got are impossible on a flat plane with a local sun
are yall still mad because of memeoulus
You can't make assumptions and use the results to perpetuate your assumptions. You're using false math that could literally do anything.
@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 just becus the dude did or didnt live, doesnt mean that the test can't be done today
@BurDur You literally cannot make that determination. Explain your logic.
***THE FUCKING TEST ASSUMES A GLOBE PRIOR TO ANYTHING!!!*** You cannot use it in real science.
Yeah with math. It's easy @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄
Here is how
Math does not reflect reality
Math is math
except it does
It's a tool
?
Except it doesn't.
I mean
The angle of shadows as a function of distance from the equator on a flat plane would be tan(d/h)
put up 1 finger
put up 1 more
das 2
This is cringe as fuck
You can create an entire cosmos with math. One that has no reflection in reality.
But on a globe it would be d/r.
The earth is a globe suck it flatties <:snapsnap:484956825863585792>
So it does ***NOT*** reflect reality.