Message from @Somedudewithaname
Discord ID: 491427548639789076
It's a category you define on a certain sert of differences
which I could define with a different set.
alright let me redefine that
Deconstruction boy.
ancestral groups
Dude I don't care.
"hurr durr your definition isnt concrete so its wrong'
You guys are honestly just racist.
i didnt even define it
lol
You can't convince him slouch
youre just a brianlet dude
Racism is good and correct
And here comes the snowflaking
They valled me a racist becuase I said sometihng racist"
I think youre just an emotional person my man
Please kill me
I am a racist
you are not logical
this is factual statement
you are emotional like a woman
I can read.
I respect women.
yes youre emotional like them
I manage to maintain a relationship.
so can I <:FeelsSmugMan:356316580143169536>
It honestly just sounds like you two need a girlfriend.
take this to <#486384968595931146> I don't wanna lose my serious role @Somedudewithaname @☦ Slouch ☦ @Thule-Gesellschaft [☩]
i dont use this chat anyway lol
Ok Ok Ok, on the inherent ethnic character of nationalism...
This essay is pretty much the best case for the ethnonational character
excellent further reading, laying out how ethnonational identity interacts with politics
For example, in the scenario that Fossett
derives from observed distributions of ethnicity and ethnic preferences,
each minority group is 20% of the population and can thus expect tohave 20% of the neighborhood composed of in-group members. ‘‘This is
far below the in-group preferences of almost all minority households,
given a median preference of 50%. Any neighborhood that randomly
deviates from the proportional distribution, even slightly, will attract
more minority members than will other neighborhoods, thereby
increasing the deviation, and attracting still more members, and so
on, until the in-group proportion exceeds the level given by the outgroup
target (Fossett, 2006).
discuss