Not weird to choose which group you hang out with lol

didn't europe try to kill itself twice in the last decade?

So what if they did? The Germanics weren't barbarians though they had pretty good tech. They also rekt the Romans at times. Look at Arminius.

I'm not seenig this pan european identity.

Romans were obviously impressive too though

What's your excuse for that?

it arises in places like the USA

mostly out of necessity

I'll agree barbarian was a harsh term.

BUt, I'm just not seeing where this ethnostate or solidarity comes from.

what are you even debating at this point

Barbarian was basically not a Roman for the Romans lol

you jumped from like 10 points

It seems to me like ethnostates need a really small demogrpahic though?

no

there is literally no reason to assume that

And on the real how do you just hand wave the other ethnostate attempts?

what other attempts?

Well the two large ethnostates both ended in disaster/

Germany

And Mussolini according to Nord but i'm not sure...

dude, we've had ethnostates for literally thousands of years prior to 1965

Umm, not really actually

most of those states were empires

@Somedudewithaname

I guess Chinese are a "small demographic"

an ethnostate can have a small minority of non ethnics in their country

the austro-hungarian empire had live 5 different langauge group

group

as long as they identify explicitly as an ethnicity

the Romans were an ethnic group, everyone knew what a Roman looked like

The russian empire was hugely diverse

@Somedudewithaname which is why it broke apart

they did not think the subjects of Rome were romans themselves

Lmfao

"Roman" referred to the white people who lived in Italy

not their subjects

No it didnt

yes it did

it refered to only the citizens of rome

in ancient texts you could describe someone's appearance by simply saying "he looked Roman"

>no it didn't

I live in former Austria Hungary you absolute brainlet Indian @Somedudewithaname