9. WAVE PROPULSION: https://imgur.com/BOi8zNF

10. SUPERFLUID AETHER MANIPULATION: https://imgur.com/xit3TfA

```
the rest are bullshit``` is an ad hominem fallacy

Most don't matter. EM fields do, but they often account for it

@Uru Search Super fluid helium

@Uru yes it is

@Human Sheeple that's not ad-hom

read your own image

yeah pretty sure not agreeing with somone isn't adhom

yeah you need to make an argument based off of the character, or some other attribute, of the person you're arguing against as opposed to what he says for it to be ad-hom

Wouldn't explain differences in acceleration across the world tho.

Anomalies

Plus, this is Flat Earth Society and they are obviously controlled opposition 😛

They often do. Many flat earthers think Mark Sargent and Matt Powerland are shills

Some even accused me of being a shill, back then...

In fact, everyone is guilty until proven innocent

Sure

24/7 flat earth discord is completly fucked cuz of memelous

It makes no sense to me when I show proof of objects obscured by the horizon while clearly seeing it and they tell me I don't understand how optics works.

Because OBVIOUSLY objects can be obscured by level water on a flat plane

Yes. @Technomatrix optics

Optical slant and angular resolution. Why distant objects distort and disappear from the bottom.

https://youtu.be/FD9PDJ-xZgI

https://youtu.be/uLLwzKPwTDc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVAWQGlXRWg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSAlVua7T4g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0Db03o_uIw

oh ok hi

that's a lot of links

@Citizen Z And what about the sun which is 4000 miles above the surface

it's not sliding across the ground

Objects could not be obscured on a flat plane, simple.
Angular resolution is about diffraction and aperture

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVJubKGYTdk

Well some people don't seem to understand

its possible on a flat earth

@Technomatrix show a reproducible experiment of buildings popping up above a curve in a scale model experiment

@Citizen Z angular resoltion is not teh angle between one object and another

@Citizen Z atmospheric lensing

@YouRYou angular resolution of the eye or lens

yep that's true

but as something gets far away it disappears all together, not bottom up

what if it went up away from you into the sky

would the bottom disappear first?

When the AR hits .02 in the eye, the light is no longer resolvable

right

It would disappear uniformly yes