@not a weeb please explain how this is mathematically possible on a standard globe earth model?

With an atmosphere, it is

yes

There is no valid flat earth model to explain this anyways. At best, it is an anomaly in the standard model.

or you did the math wrong

earth is not flat

dumbass

@Technomatrix an atmo-(shape unmeasurable) that bends light UP not DOWN around another asserted unmeasurable ball shaped floor

@Technomatrix THANK YOU

See you've found a glitch in the matrix

See you've looked at the math and you know something's not right

Government agents won't even look at it

So? It depends on the conditions. That is circumstantial

Dude

Pewdiepie

i strongly urge you to reconsider that 'math' from earlier

the one human sheeple sent

Verification for the observer height, distance, and weather conditions are key.

@Technomatrix Yes the amount of bottom up occultation as well as the amount the light curves up CHANGES depending on the weather, that's scientifically validated

so the apparent flatness is weather permitting

<:snapsnap:484956825863585792>

So the CAUSE of bottom up occultations is weather, not Spherical Earth

A combination of curvature and local atmospheric conditions

curved light

not curved surface

you have no proof of this

Curvature is verifiable and the radius of the earth is measurable. This isn't new stuff

Excuse me please? The Radius is NOT measureable when did you dig down into the core with 6,371km of tape measure?

Who needs a tape measure? Trigonometry and reference points.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/560178865184571402/FlatEarthMath21.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/560178865457070101/FlatEarthMath5.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/560178871417176065/FlatEarthMath20.png

Trigonometry that proves R is wrong or Earth isn't a ball

I mean R would have to be REDICULOUS for this to be true

For example, star declination, and obscuration agreeing on one value.

And this depends on atmospheric conditions.

REFRACTIVE WAVE OVER THE MOON: https://imgur.com/a/Np1aGgw

The apparent and geometric positions in the sky are not the same

That is why their positions are often calculated while accounting for refraction.

And they only work on a globe

may I see the scientific experiment for the
```accounting for refraction``` please

I can dig for the method.
Ultimately, it can be based on the angular speed changing to determine values