Message from @Human Sheeple

Discord ID: 560181691646476298


2019-03-26 19:18:05 UTC  

You understand it's not possible on a globe don't you?

2019-03-26 19:18:10 UTC  

No one understands the maths

2019-03-26 19:18:12 UTC  

Not even you

2019-03-26 19:18:28 UTC  

And you have to try and get people to swallow refraction models on top of globe models for it to even be possible even though light curves up?

2019-03-26 19:18:51 UTC  

It means the government was lying

2019-03-26 19:18:56 UTC  

If the earth was flat

2019-03-26 19:19:15 UTC  

if you think earth is flat then you got something wrong with your head

2019-03-26 19:19:17 UTC  

See you're not a government agent because you have actually looked at the math and at first glance it clearly contradicts the standard globe model, is that not so @Technomatrix ?

2019-03-26 19:19:24 UTC  

you may have brain damage

2019-03-26 19:19:39 UTC  

You have to determine the conditions between or else it is invalid.
Long distance photography takes advantages of superior mirages to get longer sight distances, by planning ahead of time.

2019-03-26 19:19:53 UTC  

And sometimes they can get records

2019-03-26 19:20:18 UTC  

@not a weeb please explain how this is mathematically possible on a standard globe earth model?

2019-03-26 19:20:37 UTC  

With an atmosphere, it is

2019-03-26 19:21:15 UTC  

yes

2019-03-26 19:21:25 UTC  

There is no valid flat earth model to explain this anyways. At best, it is an anomaly in the standard model.

2019-03-26 19:21:39 UTC  

or you did the math wrong

2019-03-26 19:21:45 UTC  

earth is not flat

2019-03-26 19:21:49 UTC  

dumbass

2019-03-26 19:21:58 UTC  

@Technomatrix an atmo-(shape unmeasurable) that bends light UP not DOWN around another asserted unmeasurable ball shaped floor

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/560181671777796111/FlatEarthRefractionUp7.png

2019-03-26 19:22:02 UTC  

@Technomatrix THANK YOU

2019-03-26 19:22:08 UTC  

See you've found a glitch in the matrix

2019-03-26 19:22:17 UTC  

See you've looked at the math and you know something's not right

2019-03-26 19:22:24 UTC  

Government agents won't even look at it

2019-03-26 19:22:36 UTC  

So? It depends on the conditions. That is circumstantial

2019-03-26 19:23:20 UTC  

Dude

2019-03-26 19:23:29 UTC  

Pewdiepie

2019-03-26 19:24:43 UTC  

i strongly urge you to reconsider that 'math' from earlier

2019-03-26 19:25:32 UTC  

the one human sheeple sent

2019-03-26 19:25:41 UTC  

Verification for the observer height, distance, and weather conditions are key.

2019-03-26 19:26:04 UTC  

@Technomatrix Yes the amount of bottom up occultation as well as the amount the light curves up CHANGES depending on the weather, that's scientifically validated

2019-03-26 19:26:11 UTC  

so the apparent flatness is weather permitting

2019-03-26 19:26:32 UTC  

<:snapsnap:484956825863585792>

2019-03-26 19:26:50 UTC  

So the CAUSE of bottom up occultations is weather, not Spherical Earth

2019-03-26 19:27:17 UTC  

A combination of curvature and local atmospheric conditions

2019-03-26 19:27:26 UTC  

curved light

2019-03-26 19:27:31 UTC  

not curved surface

2019-03-26 19:27:34 UTC  

you have no proof of this

2019-03-26 19:28:27 UTC  

Curvature is verifiable and the radius of the earth is measurable. This isn't new stuff

2019-03-26 19:29:11 UTC  

Excuse me please? The Radius is NOT measureable when did you dig down into the core with 6,371km of tape measure?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/560183490721873942/IFoundR.jpg

2019-03-26 19:29:41 UTC  

Who needs a tape measure? Trigonometry and reference points.