Message from @dan or whatever
Discord ID: 560182366694277316
See you're not a government agent because you have actually looked at the math and at first glance it clearly contradicts the standard globe model, is that not so @Technomatrix ?
you may have brain damage
You have to determine the conditions between or else it is invalid.
Long distance photography takes advantages of superior mirages to get longer sight distances, by planning ahead of time.
And sometimes they can get records
@not a weeb
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/560178865184571402/FlatEarthMath21.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/560178865457070101/FlatEarthMath5.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/560178871417176065/FlatEarthMath20.png
@not a weeb please explain how this is mathematically possible on a standard globe earth model?
With an atmosphere, it is
yes
There is no valid flat earth model to explain this anyways. At best, it is an anomaly in the standard model.
or you did the math wrong
earth is not flat
dumbass
@Technomatrix an atmo-(shape unmeasurable) that bends light UP not DOWN around another asserted unmeasurable ball shaped floor
@Technomatrix THANK YOU
See you've found a glitch in the matrix
See you've looked at the math and you know something's not right
Government agents won't even look at it
So? It depends on the conditions. That is circumstantial
Dude
Pewdiepie
the one human sheeple sent
Verification for the observer height, distance, and weather conditions are key.
@Technomatrix Yes the amount of bottom up occultation as well as the amount the light curves up CHANGES depending on the weather, that's scientifically validated
so the apparent flatness is weather permitting
<:snapsnap:484956825863585792>
So the CAUSE of bottom up occultations is weather, not Spherical Earth
A combination of curvature and local atmospheric conditions
curved light
not curved surface
you have no proof of this
Curvature is verifiable and the radius of the earth is measurable. This isn't new stuff
Excuse me please? The Radius is NOT measureable when did you dig down into the core with 6,371km of tape measure?
Who needs a tape measure? Trigonometry and reference points.
Trigonometry that proves R is wrong or Earth isn't a ball
I mean R would have to be REDICULOUS for this to be true
For example, star declination, and obscuration agreeing on one value.
And this depends on atmospheric conditions.
REFRACTIVE WAVE OVER THE MOON: https://imgur.com/a/Np1aGgw
The apparent and geometric positions in the sky are not the same
