Send a link and we can verify

It’s not inspect element

I don’t get how those two statements are talking points for a flat earth

@YoungPhysicist yes

Who cares if they assumed flat ground? Makes sense

Those could be so that we (readers) better understand

And then it all comes back to if they wanted to hide it, why’d they put it so clearly on the report

Also those highlights are cherry picked

I’ve read the entire document, the flat earth part is meant for mathematical simplicity, the model they use doesn’t even remotely account for the total area of the earth, for one.

Not the Earth's shadow

Just type in the info it has on the square and you can probably find the file used

Partial lighting of the moon by the sun @Derek Nelson

Earth's shadow lol

Derek has reverted to memes. Go home, everyone, we’re done here.

If you can explain a Luna eclipse that would be great @Derek Nelson

@Derek Nelson if you could explain how a thing that produces light has a shadow on it that’d be great

Wot?

That doesn’t even make mathematical sense

Yeah

Atmospheric refraction

Simple

Elegant

Meaningful

https://youtu.be/jOBNM-NAxrw

Here’s a guy using math to calculate the ISS’s altitude

Yeah plus even that is an inaccurate position because that just where the sun was 8 minutes ago

*Elegany.* Some say it’s sort of like *Mahogany.*

Spoiler alert—he gets 260 miles.

<:cool:507986727953235970><:GWspenderPaiSmug:405062890559897622>

@Ætos a typo

I know, lmao, I’m just messing around, XD

@Timebomb is that the correct measurements? I only use kilometers

Yeah, lol.

Miles suck

Use metric

The ISS’s height varies

I agree

Yes

It's about 408km