Message from @NOMEDIA_real
Discord ID: 560352314557202437
I’m 20. But I’m about to go play Kerbal Space Program and continue working on my space station
<:smart:484956754489376781>
I’m also an obnoxious 13 year old
🤦
@Derek Nelson send links. Pictures from other sites can be modified.
*Meanwhile in College/Uni.*
**im 14 and this is deep**
<:cool:507986727953235970>
I am gonna join junior college soom
Pretty deep
@Derek Nelson I love that you cited that Paper that was obviously proven to be taken out of context
@Derek Nelson LINKS!
@Derek Nelson that could be inspect element man
@Derek Nelson that proves nothing
Send a link and we can verify
It’s not inspect element
I don’t get how those two statements are talking points for a flat earth
@YoungPhysicist yes
Who cares if they assumed flat ground? Makes sense
And then it all comes back to if they wanted to hide it, why’d they put it so clearly on the report
Also those highlights are cherry picked
I’ve read the entire document, the flat earth part is meant for mathematical simplicity, the model they use doesn’t even remotely account for the total area of the earth, for one.
Not the Earth's shadow
Just type in the info it has on the square and you can probably find the file used
Partial lighting of the moon by the sun @Derek Nelson
Earth's shadow lol
Derek has reverted to memes. Go home, everyone, we’re done here.
If you can explain a Luna eclipse that would be great @Derek Nelson
@Derek Nelson if you could explain how a thing that produces light has a shadow on it that’d be great
Wot?
That doesn’t even make mathematical sense
Yeah
Atmospheric refraction
Simple
Elegant
Meaningful