I’m also an obnoxious 13 year old

🤦

@Derek Nelson send links. Pictures from other sites can be modified.

*Meanwhile in College/Uni.*

**im 14 and this is deep**

<:cool:507986727953235970>

I am gonna join junior college soom

Pretty deep

@Derek Nelson I love that you cited that Paper that was obviously proven to be taken out of context

@Derek Nelson LINKS!

@Derek Nelson that could be inspect element man

@Derek Nelson that proves nothing

Send a link and we can verify

It’s not inspect element

I don’t get how those two statements are talking points for a flat earth

@YoungPhysicist yes

Who cares if they assumed flat ground? Makes sense

Those could be so that we (readers) better understand

And then it all comes back to if they wanted to hide it, why’d they put it so clearly on the report

Also those highlights are cherry picked

I’ve read the entire document, the flat earth part is meant for mathematical simplicity, the model they use doesn’t even remotely account for the total area of the earth, for one.

Not the Earth's shadow

Just type in the info it has on the square and you can probably find the file used

Partial lighting of the moon by the sun @Derek Nelson

Earth's shadow lol

Derek has reverted to memes. Go home, everyone, we’re done here.

If you can explain a Luna eclipse that would be great @Derek Nelson

@Derek Nelson if you could explain how a thing that produces light has a shadow on it that’d be great

Wot?

That doesn’t even make mathematical sense

Yeah

Atmospheric refraction

Simple

Elegant

Meaningful

https://youtu.be/jOBNM-NAxrw

Here’s a guy using math to calculate the ISS’s altitude

Yeah plus even that is an inaccurate position because that just where the sun was 8 minutes ago