especially in the north and south

no
im saying, ..once you "Zoom in" ..its flat again
-- you're only seeing the CGI "ball" ..from way zoomed out

oh that makes sense

when i take a picture of sphere and look at it on my monitor, it's flat

therefore a sphere is flat b/c it appears flat on my monitor

@!GPT https://i.redd.it/oiywzzxo5r411.jpg

@AwwNutz - No, bc if its a true "sphere" it would have dimensions and textures/shadows/gradients/etc
it should not "appear flat" to you
otherwise you'd be looking at a flat round >circle

ya pictures from space show its a sphere

Hi....

C

that's awesome

It would have been technically impossible to fake what was seen on tv in 1969. From a technology stand point.

apollo missions were amazing

ah

thanks

@AwwNutz amazingly fake

yees

@Citizen Z you think the footage shown on tv wasn't real?

The pivotal claim for the Apollo hoax theory without which all falls apart, is that what we saw on tv was slow motion footage of astronauts running around in a film studio.

no its not

Pictures are proof something exists now? I have pictures of bigfoot and lock ness monster

@Udo ya that wouldn't work would it

Because if it wasn’t slow motion, it couldn’t have happened on Earth, right

the rate at which objects fall is not linear, and slowing it down is linear

h=1/2At^2 but slowing it down would make it a different function

Anyone know anything about how slow motion is produced in film cameras?

There are two ways to make motion slow:
One is, you shoot it at normal speed, and play it back slow.
One is, you shoot it fast and play it back normal.
The second way is called ‘Overcranking’. It looks smoother and more realistic because you’re sampling natural motion at a higher frame rate. But that means they would’ve had to shoot it on film using high speed film cameras, right? Why

@Udo I dont' know myself, how is it done