not how many time you drop something

you can do it all day

still only observation of an effect

@funkydong Not my job to answer that. You made The claim. Demonstrate it.

Then explain it with scientific support.

Alright, @mine craf cid savig has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Well, we now need evidence of gravity, now, don't we?

Alright, @mine craf cid savig has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Alright, @mine craf cid savig has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

You say it is because gravity and now you must demonstrate why it is gravity and not anything else.

still just an observation of an effect even if they ar epink

yellow

no matter what

still not matter attracting matter

if you can go win the nobel

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 good point

world been waiting 600 yrs

GL

first off that expirment is from 1789

they didnt have vaccuums yet

much less knew space wa s avaccuum

so wrong

Evangelista Torricelli produced the first laboratory vacuum in 1643

@funkydong To be completely honest, you didn't exactly prove anything with that. It's a nice hypothesis, but you need to demonstrate that what you see on paper, works in reality.

no it hsnt

it uses metals

substrates fail

or ignus mats

@funkydong Then show me.

all you proven is electro magnetism

omg

basically nothing

I'm all for being shown that I'm wrong so I can gain understanding.

@funkydong You didn't, though. You gave me a drawing on paper.

You need to show me that actually working

@funkydong No. You Still haven't set a foundation for your position, yet. We can't debate what you have provided.

all he has is observation of an effect

if he could prove gravity

hed be rich

we need anti grav for space travel

@!E20 No, it's not. He showed me A hypothesis on paper. Not an experiment in reality.