GL

first off that expirment is from 1789

they didnt have vaccuums yet

much less knew space wa s avaccuum

so wrong

Evangelista Torricelli produced the first laboratory vacuum in 1643

@funkydong To be completely honest, you didn't exactly prove anything with that. It's a nice hypothesis, but you need to demonstrate that what you see on paper, works in reality.

no it hsnt

it uses metals

substrates fail

or ignus mats

@funkydong Then show me.

all you proven is electro magnetism

omg

basically nothing

I'm all for being shown that I'm wrong so I can gain understanding.

@funkydong You didn't, though. You gave me a drawing on paper.

You need to show me that actually working

@funkydong No. You Still haven't set a foundation for your position, yet. We can't debate what you have provided.

all he has is observation of an effect

if he could prove gravity

hed be rich

we need anti grav for space travel

@!E20 No, it's not. He showed me A hypothesis on paper. Not an experiment in reality.

go get started

@funkydong Because you haven't provided anything of worth. I need a demonstration. Not a hypothesis.

watching something fall in any context is a effect

***DEMONSTRATION!!!***

not causality

go prove it

***EXPERIMENTATION***

@funkydong No.

You need to show a video of your hypothesis working in reality.

xD

You gave me a paper and said, "LOOK! PROOF!"

@funkydong

Stawp beefing

demonstration of what a effect

@BruhMoment He provided No experimentation. He gave me a hypothesis on Wikipedia.

you got nothing

but theories and bs math