You can reasonably say that “vaccines demonstrate a slight increase chance of autism compared to those who have not had vaccines” but **thats it**. You cannot accurately say vaccines cause autism. You cannot accurately say that vaccines have a higher chance of giving someone autism.

There’s also not enough consensus on what causes autism if not vaccines. So you cannot even accurately say that we should stop vaccinating children because of the risk of autism.

CONSENSUS?

Scientific consensus from years of independent research. yes.

Also, why is *that* what you’re focusing on out of everything else I said?

@Mia_ShardOfShardOfConfusion There's also a consensus of cherry picked scientists who believe man mad Carbon Dioxide is causing the ice caps to melt too, I guess you wilfully ignore the CRU emails then.

Who said I ignored any of these emails?

https://www.fourquadrant.com/consensus-buying-stalling-solution-selling-disrupting-go-to-market-strategy/

Yeah I'll trust cause and effect any day over a gang of paid shills thank you very much

I have never stated my opinions on global warming so I’m not entirely sure what’s happening here with pinging me with that picture

@Mia_ShardOfShardOfConfusion Why do you support the mass slaughter of unborn babies to propagate the vaccine industry?

Who said I did?

I certainly didn’t.

Please stop assuming you know my stances on things

You defend vaccines, you defend abortion by default.

Do I?

Abortion is a requisite of the ingredientes of vaccination yes.

@Human Sheeple _argument ad populum_ only applies if the existence of a consensus is being used to justify an argument, but scientific consensus is short hand for saying there is a vast swathe of evidence behind it

Or am I simply stating that there is no way to say that vaccines cause autism without a randomized controlled study?

@Fading There's a vast swathe of paid shills who say yes so they get their money.

Also you can’t abort a baby. You can abort a fetus. A fetus isn’t a baby.

@Mia_ShardOfShardOfConfusion I agree with you but isn't that generally a legal definition varying by jurisdiction?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The anti-human brainwash is strong with you. If I went back in time and convinced your mother to have an abortion is that alright?

Scientifically, it’s a fetus

Yes please. I hated my childhood and often wished I was dead.

Thanks, human sheeple

Unfortunately I still experienced abuse even when I was a wanted pregnancy ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Thanks for the ad hominem attack tho 👌

@Human Sheeple why is it anti-human to be okay with abortion?

Well they are legalizing post-birth abortion now https://youtu.be/H4UjIM9B9KQ

No they didn’t. That’s a protection signed into law by pres bush

@Fading It's baby murder, babies are humans too.

@Human Sheeple on what grounds?

And you've been brainwashed into thinking it's fine, newsflash you were a baby once too

_sigh_

News flash, everyone was a baby once. We were also fetuses

So what?

no fetus, no baby, no you

@Human Sheeple a partial-birth abortion is not a post-birth abortion, and the point of a partial-birth abortion is to leave a fetus intact to help with the grieving process

How do you think the baby feels being drowned in solution and cut up so the adrenochrome and organs can be harvested?