[citation needed]

I don’t understand how astronomical refraction relates to dems wearing swasticas

But ok

Huh I guess I’d rather my child be autistic than catch a horrible disease in which they’d suffer or die or spread that to those who, for medical reasons, cannot have a vaccine. But that’s just me. To each their own decisions about the life and death of their kid.

Is the increased chance statistically significant?

Is the sample size representative of the general population

Were specific types of vaccines taken into consideration

Most importantly, was there randomized control groups? You cannot say that a thing causes another unless there is randomizes control of the participants and probably also a placebo administration of the vaccine. Correlation does not equal causation.

Wow. Having autistic children is a “problem”?

What a terrible thing to say about thousands of children and families

It makes people’s lives miserable because people don’t know how to help autistic people deal with their symptoms in healthy ways

We also don’t provide affordable services for families with severely autistic children which puts a strain on everyone in the family. With financial stress and limited resources, and of course people are going to be miserable, autism or not.

Who ever said that people want people to get autism? You cannot convince others that vaccines cause autism until there’s a randomized controlled study that clearly demonstrates the effects of being in the treatment group. It’s basic research methods.

You can compare groups all you want but the fact is, comparative studies do not definitely say that one causes another. Correlations and comparative analyses do not allow to draw conclusions about the causes of one variable or the other.

You can reasonably say that “vaccines demonstrate a slight increase chance of autism compared to those who have not had vaccines” but **thats it**. You cannot accurately say vaccines cause autism. You cannot accurately say that vaccines have a higher chance of giving someone autism.

There’s also not enough consensus on what causes autism if not vaccines. So you cannot even accurately say that we should stop vaccinating children because of the risk of autism.

Scientific consensus from years of independent research. yes.

Also, why is *that* what you’re focusing on out of everything else I said?

Who said I ignored any of these emails?

I have never stated my opinions on global warming so I’m not entirely sure what’s happening here with pinging me with that picture

Who said I did?

I certainly didn’t.

Please stop assuming you know my stances on things

Do I?

Or am I simply stating that there is no way to say that vaccines cause autism without a randomized controlled study?

Also you can’t abort a baby. You can abort a fetus. A fetus isn’t a baby.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Scientifically, it’s a fetus

Yes please. I hated my childhood and often wished I was dead.

Thanks, human sheeple

Unfortunately I still experienced abuse even when I was a wanted pregnancy ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Thanks for the ad hominem attack tho 👌

No they didn’t. That’s a protection signed into law by pres bush

_sigh_

News flash, everyone was a baby once. We were also fetuses

So what?

Abortion isn’t about killing babies/fetuses for the vast majority of them (and those that are about killing fetuses are those that are a danger to the mother). It’s about bodily autonomy. A person outside the womb cannot use another persons body for any reason but a fetus inside a person can? Makes no sense

Jesus fuck. You’re not someone who’s willing to have a good faith discussion , are you, @Human Sheeple ?

Anyway. I thought this was an open minded server willing to hear out people’s opinions and facts and science but seems that isn’t the case if people who aren’t willing to discuss things in good faith get to run around like this ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I used the word shit?

The fuck?

You guys don’t allow the f-word?