Message from @Hamburger Guy
Discord ID: 567336075127947279
Google scholar pls
So you get actual papers and not esoteric blogs
I doubt there are any 21st century scientists still working on cavendish
On Cavendish itself, no
But similar experiments
Yes but it's a question of accuracy, not about whether or not it exists
Redefining constants is a hot topic in science right now
Iirc the gravitational constant we have _poor_ accuracy for
Big G is constantly being redifined
relative to the other constants
@Hamburger Guy in other words gravity is fake
Man it's hard to not trigger the bad word bot
So we would take Big G from lead and then Teflon Hexane and compare them
One of my research topics in Uni was redefining the kilogram using avogardo constant in spherical silicon balls
@Human Sheeple What would that have to do with being fake?
If gravity exists the Big G should be the same
You can redefine the wheel all the time, does that make wheels fake?
If not the Big G should be about 32 times apart
@Fading DAILY REMINDER GRAVITY IS A JOKE THAT CAN BE DEFEATED WITH A CHILDREN'S HELIUM BALLOON
1. CHANGING THE DENSITY OF THE BODY: https://imgur.com/a/uIY067X
Unless there's something more to that gif are we just ignoring buoyancy?
might have to get it custom made
yeah that seems like something you'd have to commission
I'm not quite sure why flat earthers deny gravity. Gravity doesn't really change whether or not the earth is flat.
@Fading Sheeple got it wrong because adding balloons of the same mass and volume does not change the density
@Bannebie it depends on what their explanations for the other planets and things are
@Hamburger Guy That makes even less sense than I thought but okay
@Hamburger Guy You don't understand negative relative density
@Bannebie My point is the source of denial of gravity can be dependent on the explanations for planets that flat earthers provide, which gravity might prove an issue with
@Fading LOGICAL FALLACY: SHIFTING THE BURDEN OF PROOF: https://imgur.com/tSgXe5B
@Fading Burden of proof is on you to PROVE gravity
Then they should find a different explanation for planets, because gravity is simply an effect we observe
If I have a ton of balloons of the same density individually adding more balloons will not change the density
Do the math
You mean balloons filled with WATER?
right you won't take off no
The point is that we have no idea what planets are, so using gravity to explain anything about planets is senseless.
How would Helium be different
10 fold lower density than air