Message from @Fading
Discord ID: 567333453050413067
@Superiorna_Artiljerija we need to prove that is the case
By replacing the lead balls with a material inert to static electricity
Lead is a pretty bad conductor, is it not?
@Fading it's still a conducter
So you want to dispel all doubt by using something perfectly insulating?
We know it is gravity if we calculate a similar gravitational constant
No it's a good conductor hence why it's used in car batteries
It's used in car batteries for a battery reaction, not for it's conduction
It is static electricity if the gravitational constant we calculate is noticably different
redox reaction* not battery reaction, sorry it's been a while since org chem
@Human Sheeple I assume you're talking about lead-acid batteries?
Lead has a conductivity of 4.55 x 10^6 S/m at 20 degrees C
Ah okay not as low as I thought
That's one order of magnitude LESS than copper
However Teflon has a conductivity of 10^-25 S/m which makes Lead 31 orders of magnitude better conductivity
hi good morning Human
nice
So if we use the same mass for the balls and they attract at the same speed it proves gravity and disproves Sheeple's 6 law
I kind of came into this discussion late so all I really now is we're not trusting the Cavendish experiment for some reason
Something to do with electricity I guess
@Fading Sheeple suggests that the Cavendish experiment is not a result of gravity but the rods nearing the lead balls via static electricity
The Cavendish experiment is alright though keep in mind that usually you ought to work with no external forces such as friction or torque which isn't always the case
@The Gwench Send full pfp please
ha i was watching Arwijn show too
@Bannebie can you clarify what you mean by "work with no external forces"?
@Fading Sheeple wants me to do it in the dark too lol
Didn't Cavendish also do it in a pretty isolated thick enclosure which was then inside a building he stood outside of?
Aka ideal environment. The classic *weightless string, no friction, assume π=3* stuff
So how exactly would you do that, considering that is precisely what you said, _ideal_ ?
Lead balls are the only problem according to Sheeple and that can be easily accommodated for
Also aren't there better versions of the Cavendish experiment anyway? My education is hazy but i thought it was improved upon later
well if they changed it, it couldn't hide anything
There should be a gazillion of them
right there should be 15 different ones we could look at
Looks like Charles V. Boys improved upon the design
if they changed the Cavenderp experiment
Google it
maybe tehre is
Google scholar pls
So you get actual papers and not esoteric blogs