Message from @Glasses
Discord ID: 569380290963963904
Fg = m1m2/r^2
@Glasses So by that logic 2 mases should cause an acceleration towards each other
What is that though? Can I buy one fg = m1m2/r^2 ?
yes they do.
They do mi
M8*
@Glasses Show me two bricks accelerating towards each other please
two bricks would have little force in that equation
one has to be a very large mass, and one very tiny
Show me two wheelbarrows of bricks accelerating towards each other please
They’re masses aren’t high enough to have a measurable influence
they would technically have measurable acceleration though, extremely-extremely small
Show me two buildings begin to lean towards each other in a city then
<:trolled:555217274907262976>
I think bridges are the most designed object for gravity
like in engineering
most other stuff ignores is a bit more
There is equilibrium created by the earths gravity
Show me two Container Ships accelerate towards one another please
Bridges are designed to support heavy weights over bodies of water, not for gravity, for weight
So you can't show me two masses attracting each other, can you?
Brb
the scale of 9.8m/s is about an atom per baseball, so the issue is finding two objects of that scale
No experiment, no proof.
@somekat What is the significance of the velocity of 9.8m/s?
Also what's an atom?
DROP SOMETHING FLIES UP: https://imgur.com/a/0gpjvOK
@Human Sheeple nothing, that's just to scale gravity of earth, an atom(like a single hydrogen) falls towards baseballs at 9.8, we are about the size of an atom if earth was a baseball is another way to phrase it
You calculated how fast stuff falls, but that doesn't prove gravity
It's a basic fact that stuff falls, all that is is finding the speed
falls at 9.8 what?
BBC comes in to try and make mock of a real protest with propaganda, but Sam outwitts them, love it
9.8 m/s2.
What is s2?
seconds sqaured
9.8 meters per second ^2
Alright what's so significant about this rate of acceleration
Ahh.. Gravity argument eh