Message from @Credibly Charted
Discord ID: 570790102612312074
That’s not meant in bad taste, either, Astral
r u a sperg
I just think it’s a unique way of looking at a problem.
It is
why did ppl hav2mute u
idk
Alright, <@!338155459183902721> has been warned for '**Duplicated text**'.
Alright, <@!338155459183902721> has been warned for '**Duplicated text**'.
@spiritualVapor somaRaSa I wasn't there, but he seems OK to me
For me, the surface being measurably flat implies local flatness not predicted by the standard model. Doesn't nullify spheroidal earth however, more like a surface anomaly.
That’s actually. . . Accurate.
<:GWchadThonkery:366999788803325952>
Alright, <@!338155459183902721> has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.
I always find it weird when I agree with people on this server
Which is rare.
omg thats a great explanation
can we get that pinned?
Half the trolls who join don’t even understand the concept of the standard model.
Get what pinned?
Daniel, can you pin what Astral said?
what you said man its a great explanation
<:utterdisgust:569939227916107805>
a ba'al-er ,, BEing overly nice humm
I count myself as one, but probably not truly. For me, it is more like,
"Earth is spheroidal"
But there are flat surface anomalies that deviate from gravity that the standard model doesn't take into account
@Credibly Charted
Such beautiful words
yay
So you aren't a flat earther?
im not
is it moving ,,, is the device ringing ,,that detects less than a millimeter of movement
No, WGS84 is roughly accurate
🐝
But I don't think it always is
Flat spot anomalies
is a lake curved
a mirror
Depends on the spot and area