Message from @ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan
Discord ID: 570790567403847710
For me, the surface being measurably flat implies local flatness not predicted by the standard model. Doesn't nullify spheroidal earth however, more like a surface anomaly.
That’s actually. . . Accurate.
<:GWchadThonkery:366999788803325952>
Alright, <@!338155459183902721> has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.
I always find it weird when I agree with people on this server
Which is rare.
omg thats a great explanation
can we get that pinned?
Half the trolls who join don’t even understand the concept of the standard model.
Get what pinned?
Daniel, can you pin what Astral said?
Are you a flat earther? @AstralSentient
what you said man its a great explanation
<:utterdisgust:569939227916107805>
a ba'al-er ,, BEing overly nice humm
I count myself as one, but probably not truly. For me, it is more like,
"Earth is spheroidal"
But there are flat surface anomalies that deviate from gravity that the standard model doesn't take into account
@Credibly Charted
Such beautiful words
yay
So you aren't a flat earther?
im not
is it moving ,,, is the device ringing ,,that detects less than a millimeter of movement
No, WGS84 is roughly accurate
🐝
But I don't think it always is
Flat spot anomalies
is a lake curved
a mirror
Depends on the spot and area
As a general rule of thumb tho, yes, curved
Sosa Chamberlain
One of the first maps made was a concave map
I can't remember name now
Began with a m
u do know the jesuits made up that theory 500 years ago as just a theory & still is only a theory
you realize that the first time someone makes something it probably doesnt work
But it works,
So why not use it?