Why can mr. science post all these photos without having to give anything to back them up while ignoring the points I've been making to him - and yet I still can't post pictures when i need to...?

The conditions were measured and by examination of the models considered, the non-curvature model is all that holds in this scenario. The others assume total internal reflection and a type of terrestrial refraction under a density gradient that wasn't confirmed or quantified.
The area is not conforming to the geoid surface.

7. PRESENCE OF ELECTRO-MAGNETIC FIELDS: https://imgur.com/a/LvRVZ5E

have you guys heard about china's artificial moon and sun

What is it?

exactly what i said

Further explanation?

Oh really now

https://youtu.be/9EPlyiW-xGI?t=1204

search it up

hi guys whats cracking, cirtainly not the ice wall

;-;

i want out

@Australian Guy no offence but I know its lies already

How can the earth be flat when gravity will just pull the earth into a globe anyway?

gravity doesnt pull things to a centre of mass

it pulls things in 1 direction

smh

silly peasants

u wish u had my cleverer

@ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan its not lies

it is

LIES

OI

POO OFF

you are lies

bruh

Hello fellow flatties

Gravity attraction of the planets above is a lie, Infact what planets. Even are is a lie

whats the context before that @Mr.science

how can gravity be a lie when it was PROVEN? smh

There is a force yes

I'm saying it's not gravity as they tell you

"they"

?

Ms

wot if there is gravity but