@Mr.science one's interpretation of that verse is heavily dependant on which version you are using. see for yourself: https://biblehub.com/job/37-18.htm

@AstralSentient no it isnt

Some versions don't even talk as if its a hard surface @Mr.science

its been proven so many times that its the atmosphere

ill find a video for u if i can find it

This is my favorite

One

Why can mr. science post all these photos without having to give anything to back them up while ignoring the points I've been making to him - and yet I still can't post pictures when i need to...?

The conditions were measured and by examination of the models considered, the non-curvature model is all that holds in this scenario. The others assume total internal reflection and a type of terrestrial refraction under a density gradient that wasn't confirmed or quantified.
The area is not conforming to the geoid surface.

7. PRESENCE OF ELECTRO-MAGNETIC FIELDS: https://imgur.com/a/LvRVZ5E

have you guys heard about china's artificial moon and sun

What is it?

exactly what i said

Further explanation?

Oh really now

https://youtu.be/9EPlyiW-xGI?t=1204

search it up

hi guys whats cracking, cirtainly not the ice wall

;-;

i want out

@Australian Guy no offence but I know its lies already

How can the earth be flat when gravity will just pull the earth into a globe anyway?

gravity doesnt pull things to a centre of mass

it pulls things in 1 direction

smh

silly peasants

u wish u had my cleverer

@ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan its not lies

it is

LIES

OI

POO OFF

you are lies

bruh

Hello fellow flatties

Gravity attraction of the planets above is a lie, Infact what planets. Even are is a lie

whats the context before that @Mr.science