idiot basic math

wtf is that

inverse square law

inverse square law is idiot math ?

never heard of it 😤😤😤

yea

child math

are u saying its easy ok

i am a child

i havent ever learned abt that

smh

good its easy math so why wasnt the moon brighter

brighter when?

where

sigh

lmao

apollo mission

like in general+

oh

u jumped in here like a firecracker first off hello

What do you mean why wasnt it brighter?

oh hi btw

Wait lemme scroll up and read

doesnt the inverse square law make light brighter the closer u get

or dimmer the farther u get away from the light

by a very specific amount

Can you post ur argument again

or point whatever sorry

on the apollo missions shouldnt the moon have been much brighter according to the inverse square law

i know it only applies when u can see the whole light in one frame but their was points where it should have been like what a billion lumens lol

i never did the math but it would have to be an insane amount brighter

ive got issues with the brightness of the moon at multiple points during the apollo mission but i think approaching is the biggest one cause their is a law that proves it should have been brighter

noone has anything to say to that ?

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ HELP

The moon was brighter, they were standing right on it

But what measurement of Q don't think is suspect?

@PsyClone

im talking about the point before they landed or after they took off

Inverse square law does apply to a reflective surface when a light source reaches it, although the inverse square law usually refers to sources of light. But you have to take in the account of how much light is actually reflected. The moon actualy has a lower albedo than earth, at 0.12 compared to 0. 33 of the earth

@PsyClone You're verified please post an image in rejoice

Im not too sure but this is what i think is happening