Message from @Human Sheeple
Discord ID: 576084881663328256
chris hadfield tweeted hole in the iss the posted a pic of a hole in a satellite that h appened years before so
No evidence of virtual objects
i trust him
u can believe what u want
the tiems when they do play with the bubbles doesnt even match reality
What doesn't match
not only are they using special effects and wires and parabolic flight but their story isnt consistent and or doesnt match reality
figure it out or not idc
You're judgement here is flawrd
believe them blindly if u want its up to u
How do they simulate weightlessness for minutes, in a plane
Is every water droplet on a string?
"In fact, it can be shown that the refraction near the horizon depends mostly on the local temperature gradient, which is much more important than the local temperature itself. For this reason, all the refraction phenomena near the horizon — mirages, dip, terrestrial refraction, etc., as well as the astronomical refraction — are very sensitive to the temperature gradient; and they all vary a great deal more than does the astronomical refraction well up in the sky."
To: "It is obvious that the effect of temperature variation is decisive over the
other atmospheric factors on refraction, to the following proportions: Temperature to humidity to carbon dioxide content to air pressure = 100 : 6 : 2 : 1 "
INVESTIGATION OF REFRACTION
IN THE LOW ATMOSPHERE
By
K. HORV_,.TH
Department of Survey. Technical university. Budapest
(Received Alay 29, 1969)
Presented by Ass. Prof. Dr. F. SAHKOZY
https://aty.sdsu.edu/explain/atmos_refr/astr_refr.html
@Shabam because I have peer reviewed scientific evidence and you do not
@Human Sheeple oh so all of the sudden peer reviewed science isngood enough?
Ok what about all the peer reviewed science for spaceflight and shape of the earth
And since you invoked astronomy, what about the aberration of light that proves the earth is moving
@Human Sheeple fisheye lense
@Shabam Aberration of light was added to fit the model when it didn't add up
@Shabam What peer reviewed measurement of the Earth?
Lol the entirety of geodesy fool
Name me one thing right now
You don't even know Snell's law properly, go read more
I own a laser and I understand snell's law very well in fact
Lol own a laser? A pointer?
What type of laser is it
As for your fish eye lens claim, why is the horizon flat in the photographs and videos provided?
445nm
Changing the subject, deflection. can you answer the question please @Shabam
Or are you butt hurt you lost a debate to a flat earther
FLAT EARTH GLOBER MELTDOWN: https://imgur.com/gJsKaGX
🦑
🦐
Earth is flat = 🦞
<:PikaGun:530642541641465857>