Was it to develop a new weapon? Remember, there were at war with soviets

Was it for pleasure?

Of course its like playing the victim card just as some african americans want reparations from slavery.'

its wrong

its like that but worse

because they own the media and academia so its engrained much deeper and more subtly

what motive did those might had? Give us an hypothesis

even if the holocaust is completly true the ends to which they use it are still against our interests

but you cant deny taught history, if it's not true then we have the right to deny any basic history that has been passed on generation by generation, im guessing we never landed on the moon either?

>>>>>Conservstism

history is facts and narratives

It isn't ground breaking. It's typical Jewish behavior. First establish themselves inside of a host nation that's willing to take them in after they've been expelled from the last, then they isolate themselves and extract wealth from said host nation and once the local population get's fed up with their bullshit, they accuse them of bigotry and anti-Semitism until they're either (A expelled from the country or (B They destroy it entirely.

facts are objective the narrative is completely subjective

was vietnam a just war?

a lot of bad stuff happened

were those soldiers monsters or just men?

did we light those children on fire?

was the Iraq war done under true facts?

did we kill over 4 million of them to stop them frmo getting a gov we didn't like?

were where those "weapons of mass destruction"

and we screwed up sending our men there to fight people with the geographical advantage.

1 million and a half iraqis dead, no weapons found

The kikes have been expelled from over 300 nations throughout history. Almost all great figures of culture throughout history have came out against them. But no they were all batshit crazy

so, is "taught history" absolutely correct when it comes to Iraq War?

my point is history is not just facts but also narratives with judgments. Vietnam could either be good or bad depending on what a person is trying to push. The same with WW2 and the holocaust.

was the USSR a evil empire?

The USSR was an empire tbh

are they evil because they had a bad economic system?

Yes but even if we ignore the emotional aspect of it, we still have records that millions of people died, by the Nazis.

what if they were better than most governments in history but not up to par with what is now considered standard? does make them evil

Not as bad as capitalism but still übergay

Wym by "emotional aspect"?

Rather, you mean "emotional impact" I believe.

yes emotional impact

do we demonize turkish identity because they killed a bunch of armenians? or japanese because they did the same to the chinese?

Now, emotional impact on WHO?

or does once small minority garner inordinate sympathy

why is that

society in general.

On who's being pushed down this narrative?

I can tell you, in South America we don't see them as bad